The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using L‐systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L‐PEACH model
Open accessAbstract
Functional-structural plant models simulate the development of plant structure, taking into account plant physiology and environmental factors. The L-PEACH model is based on the development of peach trees. It demonstrates the usefulness of L-systems in constructing functional-structural models. L-PEACH uses L-systems both to simulate the development of tree structure and to solve differential equations for carbohydrate flow and allocation. New L-system-based algorithms are devised for simulating the behavior of dynamically changing structures made of hundreds of interacting, time-varying, nonlinear components. L-PEACH incorporates a carbon-allocation model driven by source-sink interactions between tree components. Storage and mobilization of carbohydrates during the annual life cycle of a tree are taken into account. Carbohydrate production in the leaves is simulated based on the availability of water and light. Apices, internodes, leaves and fruit grow according to the resulting local carbohydrate supply. L-PEACH outputs an animated three-dimensional visual representation of the growing tree and user-specified statistics that characterize selected stages of plant development. The model is applied to simulate a tree's response to fruit thinning and changes in water stress. L-PEACH may be used to assist in horticultural decision-making processes after being calibrated to specific trees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants
Prusinkiewicz, P., & Lindenmayer, A. (1990) · The Virtual Laboratory · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8476-2 · Cited by 2,823
Self-citationMathematical models for cellular interactions in development I. Filaments with one-sided inputs
Lindenmayer, A. (1968) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(68)90079-9 · Cited by 1,620
Pochet, P. (2006) · Griffith Research Online · Cited by 1,550
Physiological Plant Ecology I: Responses to the Physical Environment
(1981) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-68090-8 · Cited by 1,446
A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES
Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., & Kira, T. (1964) · Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi · doi:10.18960/seitai.14.3_97 · Cited by 1,128
Lindenmayer, A. (1968) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(68)90080-5 · Cited by 828
Photosynthesis, Carbon Partitioning, and Yield
Gifford, R. M., & Evans, L. T. (1981) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.32.060181.002413 · Cited by 748
Physiological Responses to Moderate Water Stress
Bradford, K. J., & Hsiao, T. C. (1982) · Physiological Plant Ecology II · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-68150-9_10 · Cited by 575
Plant and Crop Modelling: A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology
Thornley, J. H. M., & Johnson, I. R. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 565
Visual models of plants interacting with their environment
Měch, R., & Prusinkiewicz, P. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237279 · Cited by 550
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04794.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04794.x
- 10.1006/anbo.2000.1149 · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1149
- 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00860.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00860.x
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb02047.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb02047.x
- Farrar J, 1998, Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences., 183
- 10.1007/978-3-540-24687-9_9 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24687-9_9
- 10.1006/anbo.1995.1122 · doi:10.1006/anbo.1995.1122
- 10.1139/x02-101 · doi:10.1139/x02-101
- 10.14214/sf.a8530 · doi:10.14214/sf.a8530
- 10.21273/HORTSCI.25.3.274 · doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.3.274
- 10.1006/anbo.1996.0011 · doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0011
- Press WH, 1992, Numerical Recipes in C
- 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.630.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5193(85)80239-3 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(85)80239-3
Cited by
Multiple pathways regulate shoot branching
Rameau, C., Bertheloot, J., Leduc, N., Andrieu, B., Foucher, F., & Sakr, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00741 · Cited by 357
Roles for Auxin, Cytokinin, and Strigolactone in Regulating Shoot Branching
Ferguson, B. J., & Beveridge, C. A. (2009) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.135475 · Cited by 355
Dardick, C., Callahan, A., Horn, R., Ruiz, K. B., Zhebentyayeva, T., Hollender, C., Whitaker, M., Abbott, A., & Scorza, R. (2013) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12234 · Cited by 184
The Arabidopsis genome: A foundation for plant research
Bevan, M., & Walsh, S. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3723405 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, M. T., Prusinkiewicz, P., & DeJong, T. M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-18
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 869-880
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2169876309
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using L‐systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L‐PEACH model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01348.x
- The paper
- Allen, M. T., Prusinkiewicz, P., & DeJong, T. M. (2005). Using L‐systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L‐PEACH model. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01348.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.