Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using L‐systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L‐PEACH model

Open access
Allen, M. T., Prusinkiewicz, P., DeJong, T. M.·2005·New Phytologist

Abstract

Functional-structural plant models simulate the development of plant structure, taking into account plant physiology and environmental factors. The L-PEACH model is based on the development of peach trees. It demonstrates the usefulness of L-systems in constructing functional-structural models. L-PEACH uses L-systems both to simulate the development of tree structure and to solve differential equations for carbohydrate flow and allocation. New L-system-based algorithms are devised for simulating the behavior of dynamically changing structures made of hundreds of interacting, time-varying, nonlinear components. L-PEACH incorporates a carbon-allocation model driven by source-sink interactions between tree components. Storage and mobilization of carbohydrates during the annual life cycle of a tree are taken into account. Carbohydrate production in the leaves is simulated based on the availability of water and light. Apices, internodes, leaves and fruit grow according to the resulting local carbohydrate supply. L-PEACH outputs an animated three-dimensional visual representation of the growing tree and user-specified statistics that characterize selected stages of plant development. The model is applied to simulate a tree's response to fruit thinning and changes in water stress. L-PEACH may be used to assist in horticultural decision-making processes after being calibrated to specific trees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01348.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04794.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04794.x
  2. 10.1006/anbo.2000.1149 · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1149
  3. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00860.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00860.x
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb02047.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb02047.x
  5. Farrar J, 1998, Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences., 183
  6. 10.1007/978-3-540-24687-9_9 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24687-9_9
  7. 10.1006/anbo.1995.1122 · doi:10.1006/anbo.1995.1122
  8. 10.1139/x02-101 · doi:10.1139/x02-101
  9. 10.14214/sf.a8530 · doi:10.14214/sf.a8530
  10. 10.21273/HORTSCI.25.3.274 · doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.3.274
  11. 10.1006/anbo.1996.0011 · doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0011
  12. Press WH, 1992, Numerical Recipes in C
  13. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.630.1 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0022-5193(85)80239-3 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(85)80239-3

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Allen, M. T., Prusinkiewicz, P., & DeJong, T. M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02-18
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
869-880
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2169876309
Cited by
357
References
25
FWCI
22.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using L‐systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L‐PEACH model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01348.x
The paper
Allen, M. T., Prusinkiewicz, P., & DeJong, T. M. (2005). Using L‐systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L‐PEACH model. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01348.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.