The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil biota and invasive plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Interactions between plants and soil biota resist invasion by some nonnative plants and facilitate others. In this review, we organize research and ideas about the role of soil biota as drivers of invasion by nonnative plants and how soil biota may fit into hypotheses proposed for invasive success. For example, some invasive species benefit from being introduced into regions of the world where they encounter fewer soil‐borne enemies than in their native ranges. Other invasives encounter novel but strong soil mutualists which enhance their invasive success. Leaving below‐ground natural enemies behind or encountering strong mutualists can enhance invasions, but indigenous enemies in soils or the absence of key soil mutualists can help native communities resist invasions. Furthermore, inhibitory and beneficial effects of soil biota on plants can accelerate or decelerate over time depending on the net effect of accumulating pathogenic and mutualistic soil organisms. These ‘feedback’ relationships may alter plant–soil biota interactions in ways that may facilitate invasion and inhibit re‐establishment by native species. Although soil biota affect nonnative plant invasions in many different ways, research on the topic is broadening our understanding of why invasive plants can be so astoundingly successful and expanding our perspectives on the drivers of natural community organization. Contents Summary 445 I Introduction 446 II Soil community effects 446 III Soil‐borne antagonists 451 IV Soil‐borne mutualists 452 V Conclusion 454 Acknowledgements 454 References 454
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826 · cited 1×
“, 2005) and similar findings have been reported for areas invaded by garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) (Roberts & Anderson, 2001; Stinson et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta‐analytical review
Kulmatiski, A., Beard, K. H., Stevens, J. R., & Cobbold, S. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.x · Cited by 983
Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions
SAX, D., STACHOWICZ, J., BROWN, J., BRUNO, J., DAWSON, M., GAINES, S., GROSBERG, R., HASTINGS, A., HOLT, R., & MAYFIELD, M. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.009 · Cited by 931
Root Exudates Regulate Soil Fungal Community Composition and Diversity
Broeckling, C. D., Broz, A. K., Bergelson, J., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02188-07 · Cited by 803
Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs
Gioria, M., & Osborne, B. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00501 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinhart, K. O., & Callaway, R. M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-12
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 445-457
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2092685605
- Cited by
- 820
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil biota and invasive plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01715.x
- The paper
- Reinhart, K. O., & Callaway, R. M. (2006). Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01715.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.