The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid‐ribs in temperate plants
Open accessAbstract
The implications of extensive variation in leaf size for biomass distribution between physiological and support tissues and for overall leaf physiological activity are poorly understood. Here, we tested the hypotheses that increases in leaf size result in enhanced whole-plant support investments, especially in compound-leaved species, and that accumulation of support tissues reduces average leaf nitrogen (N) content per unit dry mass (N(M)), a proxy for photosynthetic capacity. Leaf biomass partitioning among the lamina, mid-rib and petiole, and whole-plant investments in leaf support (within-leaf and stem) were studied in 33 simple-leaved and 11 compound-leaved species. Support investments in mid-ribs and petioles increased with leaf size similarly in simple leaves and leaflets of compound leaves, but the overall support mass fraction within leaves was larger in compound-leaved species as a result of prominent rachises. Within-leaf and within-plant support mass investments were negatively correlated. Therefore, the total plant support fraction was independent of leaf size and lamina dissection. Because of the lower N(M) of support biomass, the difference in N(M) between the entire leaf and the photosynthetic lamina increased with leaf size. We conclude that whole-plant support costs are weakly size-dependent, but accumulation of support structures within the leaf decreases whole-leaf average N(M), potentially reducing the integrated photosynthetic activity of larger leaves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Self-citationPlant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species
Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A., & Wright, I. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 · Cited by 3,069
photosynthesis--nitrogen relationship in wild plants
Field, C. B., & Mooney, H. A. (1986) · Cited by 1,634
The Adaptive Geometry of Trees
Wickens, G. E., & Horn, H. S. (1972) · Kew Bulletin · doi:10.2307/4109478 · Cited by 1,012
Allocating Resources to Reproduction and Defense
Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., & Pitelka, L. F. (1987) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310178 · Cited by 1,005
The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co‐ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species
SACK, L., COWAN, P. D., JAIKUMAR, N., & HOLBROOK, N. M. (2003) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01058.x · Cited by 809
Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology
Pugnaire, F. I., & Valladares, F. (1999) · Cited by 672
Ackerly, D., Knight, C., Weiss, S., Barton, K., & Starmer, K. (2002) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420100805 · Cited by 559
A Whole-Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions.
Burke, M. K., Dickson, R. E., Jacques, R., & Garnier, E. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265523 · Cited by 434
Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences
Čatský, J. (1999) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1023/a:1007180331888 · Cited by 412
Cited by
Niinemets, Ü. (2010) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4 · Cited by 676
Self-citationPreston, K. A., Cornwell, W. K., & DeNoyer, J. L. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01712.x · Cited by 527
Functional recovery of secondary tropical forests
Poorter, L., Rozendaal, D. M. A., Bongers, F., Almeida, D. J. S., Álvarez, F. S., Andrade, J. L., Arreola Villa, L. F., Becknell, J. M., Bhaskar, R., Boukili, V., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2003405118 · Cited by 147
Untangling leaf expansion triggers: A new experimental study with Epipremnum aureum (Araceae)
Brito, C., Mantuano, D., De Toni, K. L. G., & Mantovani, A. (2022) · Flora · doi:10.1016/j.flora.2022.152139 · Cited by 6
Increasing leaf sizes of the vine Epipremnum aureum (Araceae): photosynthesis and respiration
Brito, C., Mantuano, D., De Toni, K. L. G., & Mantovani, A. (2025) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.19214 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Niinemets, Ü., Portsmuth, A., & Tobias, M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-28
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-104
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1975501311
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid‐ribs in temperate plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01741.x
- The paper
- Niinemets, Ü., Portsmuth, A., & Tobias, M. (2006). Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid‐ribs in temperate plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01741.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.