Cited by 72Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlArsenic contamination and mitigationEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Arsenic hyperaccumulation in the Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata) deters grasshopper (Schistocerca americana) herbivory

Rathinasabapathi, Bala, Rangasamy, Murugesan, Froeba, Jason, Cherry, Ronald H., McAuslane, Heather J., Capinera, John L., Srivastava, Mrittunjai, Ma, Lena Q.·2007·New Phytologist

Abstract

Brake fern, Pteris vittata, not only tolerates arsenic but also hyperaccumulates it in the frond. The hypothesis that arsenic hyperaccumulation in this fern could function as a defense against insect herbivory was tested. Fronds from control and arsenic-treated ferns were presented to nymphs of the grasshopper Schistocerca americana. Feeding damage was recorded by visual observation and quantification of the fresh weight of frond left uneaten and number of fecal pellets produced over a 2-d period. Grasshopper weight was determined before and after 5 d of feeding. Grasshoppers consumed significantly greater amounts of the frond tissue, produced more fecal pellets and had increased body weight on control plants compared with grasshoppers fed arsenic-treated ferns. Very little or none of the arsenic-treated ferns were consumed indicating feeding deterrence. In a feeding deterrent experiment with lettuce, sodium arsenite at 1.0 mm deterred grasshoppers from feeding whereas 0.1 mm did not. In a choice experiment, grasshoppers preferred to feed on lettuce dipped in water compared with lettuce dipped in 1.0 mm sodium arsenite. Our results show that arsenic hyperaccumulation in brake fern is an elemental defense against grasshopper herbivory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02099.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rathinasabapathi, B., Rangasamy, M., Froeba, J., Cherry, R. H., McAuslane, H. J., Capinera, J. L., Srivastava, M., & Ma, L. Q.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Rathinasabapathi, Bala
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-24
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
363-369
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2113806026
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
arsenic hyperaccumulation, Pteris vittata, Schistocerca americana, grasshopper herbivory, antifeedant activity, plant chemical defense, sodium arsenite, plant-insect interactions, fecal pellets
MeSH terms
Animals, Arsenic, Biodegradation, Environmental, Feeding Behavior, Grasshoppers, Ferns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review