The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions
Abstract
Summary: Many plants interact with carnivores as an indirect defence against herbivores. The release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the secretion of extrafloral nectar (EFN) are induced by insect feeding, a response that is mediated by the plant hormone, jasmonic acid. Although VOCs mainly attract predatory mites and parasitic wasps, while EFN mainly attracts ants, many more animal–plant interactions are influenced by these two traits. Other traits involved in defensive tritrophic interactions are cellular food bodies and domatia, which serve the nutrition and housing of predators. They are not known to respond to herbivory, while food body production can be induced by the presence of the mutualists. Interactions among the different defensive traits, and between them and other biotic and abiotic factors exist on the genetic, physiological, and ecological levels, but so far remain understudied. Indirect defences are increasingly being discussed as an environmentally‐friendly crop protection strategy, but much more knowledge on their fitness effects under certain environmental conditions is required before we can understand their ecological and evolutionary relevance, and before tritrophic interactions can serve as a reliable tool in agronomy. Contents Summary 1 I. Introduction 2 II. Facultative indirect defences 3 III. Production of indirect defences 9 IV. Interactions among different strategies 12 V. Outlook 14 Acknowledgements 14 References 15
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mosquito Sugar Feeding and Reproductive Energetics
Foster, W. A. (1995) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.002303 · Cited by 709
Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction
Gatehouse, J. A. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00519.x · Cited by 704
Cited by
Long-distance signalling in plant defence
Heil, M., & Ton, J. (2008) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.005 · Cited by 608
Self-citationSites of synthesis, biochemistry and functional role of plant volatiles
Maffei, M. E. (2010) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2010.03.003 · Cited by 342
Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help
DICKE, M. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01913.x · Cited by 337
Therapeutic Potential of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids from Forests for Inflammatory Diseases
Kim, T., Song, B., Cho, K. S., & Lee, I.-S. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21062187 · Cited by 281
Forest Volatile Organic Compounds and Their Effects on Human Health: A State-of-the-Art Review
Antonelli, M., Donelli, D., Barbieri, G., Valussi, M., Maggini, V., & Firenzuoli, F. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186506 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Heil, M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-17
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-61
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2043739372
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02330.x
- The paper
- Heil, M. (2008). Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02330.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.