Cited by 121Arsenic contamination and mitigationHeavy metals in environmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Arsenic uptake and speciation in the rootless duckweed Wolffia globosa

Open access
Zhang, Xin, Zhao, Fang‐Jie, Huang, Qing, Williams, Paul N., Sun, Guo‐Xin, Zhu, Yong‐Guan·2009·New Phytologist

Abstract

Duckweeds are a common macrophyte in paddy and aquatic environments. Here, we investigated arsenic (As) accumulation, speciation and tolerance of the rootless duckweed Wolffia globosa and its potential for As phytofiltration. When grown with 1 microm arsenate, W. globosa accumulated two to 10 times more As than four other duckweed or Azolla species tested. W. globosa was able to accumulate > 1000 mg As kg(-1) in frond dry weight (DW), and tolerate up to 400 mg As kg(-1) DW. At the low concentration range, uptake rate was similar for arsenate and arsenite, but at the high concentration range, arsenite was taken up at a faster rate. Arsenite was the predominant As species (c. 90% of the total extractable As) in both arsenate- and arsenite-exposed duckweed. W. globosa was more resistant to external arsenate than arsenite, but showed a similar degree of tolerance internally. W. globosa decreased arsenate in solution rapidly, but also effluxed arsenite. Wolffia globosa is a strong As accumulator and an interesting model plant to study As uptake and metabolism because of the lack of a root-to-frond translocation barrier.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02758.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eriophorum angustifolium hyperaccumulates As in root tissues, while in Wolffia globose, up to 400 mg kg-1 of As is accumulated.

    “Eriophorum angustifolium hyperaccumulates As in root tissues, while in Wolffia globose, up to 400 mg kg–1 of As is accumulated (Stoltz and Greger, 2002; Zhang et al., 2009).”

    From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2009

    The Abstract reports that W. globosa accumulates arsenic, but distinguishes accumulation of more than 1000 mg kg−1 from tolerance of up to 400 mg kg−1. The Discussion likewise identifies approximately 400 mg kg−1 as the upper limit without significant growth inhibition, not the maximum accumulated. The Eriophorum claim is paired with a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Zhao, F., Huang, Q., Williams, P. N., Sun, G., & Zhu, Y.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-27
Volume
182
Issue
2
Pages
421-428
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2102954681
Cited by
121
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (40730740)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
arsenic uptake, arsenic speciation, Wolffia globosa, duckweed, arsenate, arsenite, arsenic tolerance, arsenic accumulation, arsenite efflux, arsenic metabolism, aquatic macrophytes, paddy ecosystem
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Arsenates, Arsenic, Arsenites, Magnoliopsida

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review