The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbiological control of soil‐borne phytopathogenic fungi with special emphasis on wilt‐inducing Fusarium oxysporum
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Plant diseases induced by soil‐borne plant pathogens are among the most difficult to control. In the absence of effective chemical control methods, there is renewed interest in biological control based on application of populations of antagonistic micro‐organisms. In addition to Pseudomonas spp. and Trichoderma spp., which are the two most widely studied groups of biological control agents, the protective strains of Fusarium oxysporum represent an original model. These protective strains of F. oxysporum can be used to control wilt induced by pathogenic strains of the same species.Exploring the mechanisms involved in the protective capability of these strains is not only necessary for their development as commercial biocontrol agents but raises many basic questions related to the determinism of pathogenicity versus biocontrol capacity in the F. oxysporum species complex. In this paper, current knowledge regarding the interaction between the plant and the protective strains is reviewed in comparison with interactions between the plant and pathogenic strains. The success of biological control depends not only on plant–microbial interactions but also on the ecological fitness of the biological control agents. ContentsSummary 529I.Biological control of plant diseases: state of the art 530II.Main modes of action of biological control agents 530III.The protective strains of F. oxysporum: an unexplored model 532IV.Future directions for the study of the protective capacity of strains of F. oxysporum 539V.How to make biological control successful in the field? 540References 541
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
O’Donnell, K., Kistler, H. C., Cigelnik, E., & Ploetz, R. C. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2044 · Cited by 2,431
Ryals, J. A., Neuenschwander, U. H., Willits, M. G., Molina, A., Steiner, H. Y., & Hunt, M. D. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809 · Cited by 1,988
M ICROBIAL P OPULATIONS R ESPONSIBLE FOR S PECIFIC S OIL S UPPRESSIVENESS TO P LANT P ATHOGENS
Weller, D. M., Raaijmakers, J. M., Gardener, B. B. M., & Thomashow, L. S. (2002) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.030402.110010 · Cited by 1,683
Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions
Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E. L., Marra, R., Woo, S. L., & Lorito, M. (2008) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002 · Cited by 1,396
The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
Cook, R., & Baker, K. F. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,265
A Novel Signaling Pathway Controlling Induced Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Pieterse, C. M. J., van Wees, S. C. M., van Pelt, J. A., Knoester, M., Laan, R., Gerrits, H., Weisbeek, P. J., & van Loon, L. C. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.9.1571 · Cited by 1,207
Ryals, J. A., Neuenschwander, U. H., Willits, M. G., Molina, A., Steiner, H.-Y., & Hunt, M. D. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.2307/3870231 · Cited by 1,106
The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
Jeffries, P. (1984) · Physiological Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/0048-4059(84)90064-x · Cited by 931
Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes
Van Wees, S. C., Van der Ent, S., & Pieterse, C. M. (2008) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.005 · Cited by 922
Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis
van Hulten, M., Pelser, M., van Loon, L. C., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Ton, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0510213103 · Cited by 857
Cited by
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Trichoderma: The “Secrets” of a Multitalented Biocontrol Agent
Sood, M., Kapoor, D., Kumar, V., Sheteiwy, M. S., Ramakrishnan, M., Landi, M., Araniti, F., & Sharma, A. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9060762 · Cited by 650
van der Wal, A., Geydan, T. D., Kuyper, T. W., & de Boer, W. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12001 · Cited by 404
Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review
Raymaekers, K., Ponet, L., Holtappels, D., Berckmans, B., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240 · Cited by 367
Biological control of plant diseases – What has been achieved and what is the direction?
Collinge, D. B., Jensen, D. F., Rabiey, M., Sarrocco, S., Shaw, M. W., & Shaw, R. H. (2022) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/ppa.13555 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Alabouvette, C., Olivain, C., Migheli, Q., & Steinberg, C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-16
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 529-544
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2026066147
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiological control of soil‐borne phytopathogenic fungi with special emphasis on wilt‐inducing Fusarium oxysporum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03014.x
- The paper
- Alabouvette, C., Olivain, C., Migheli, Q., & Steinberg, C. (2009). Microbiological control of soil‐borne phytopathogenic fungi with special emphasis on wilt‐inducing Fusarium oxysporum. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03014.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
