The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In current plant disease control, the divergence from chemical pesticide use has been fueled by the public concern about toxicity and environmental impact of these products, the development of pesticide-resistant pathogens, a rising ban of existing pesticides and, a decreased registration of new ones. Due its high potential as alternative/complement to these pesticides, biological disease control is now generally recognized and constitute an important tool in integrated pest management (IPM). However, one of the factors hampering the large-scale implementation of biocontrol is the lack of efficient, commercially available biocontrol agents (BCAs). The identification of novel BCAs thus forms a critical step in the development of commercial biocontrol products and requires rapid and robust screening methods suitable to evaluate high numbers of candidate BCAs. In this review, we present an overview and discussion of the screening systems reported to select novel BCAs for biocontrol of microbial plant diseases. Distinction is made between screenings for BCAs with direct antagonistic effect on the pathogen (via e.g. parasitism, antibiosis, or competition) and BCAs that exert their biocontrol activity indirectly by induction in the plant of an induced systemic resistance (ISR) to the pathogen. For both types, we further discriminate between phenotype- and marker-based approaches, which evaluate directly the intended phenotype (disease reduction) or the expression of a marker predictive for this phenotype, respectively. Finally, we discuss the importance of the type and origin of candidate BCA collections as a significant determinant of the screening success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692
OERKE, E.-C. (2006) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 · Cited by 5,283
The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops
Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S. J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., & Nelson, A. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y · Cited by 4,309
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Significance of Inducible Defense-related Proteins in Infected Plants
van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 · Cited by 3,410
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
Pesticide Exposure, Safety Issues, and Risk Assessment Indicators
Damalas, C. A., & Eleftherohorinos, I. G. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8051402 · Cited by 2,426
Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects
Kim, K.-H., Kabir, E., & Jahan, S. A. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.009 · Cited by 2,140
Cited by
Combining Biocontrol Agents with Chemical Fungicides for Integrated Plant Fungal Disease Control
Ons, L., Bylemans, D., Thevissen, K., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8121930 · Cited by 438
Self-citationAhsan, T., Zang, C., Yu, S., Pei, X., Xie, J., Lin, Y., Liu, X., & Liang, C. (2022) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof8111223 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Raymaekers, K., Ponet, L., Holtappels, D., Berckmans, B., & Cammue, B. P. A.
- Venue
- Biological Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 104240
- ISSN
- 1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011088472
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 161
- FWCI
- 28.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240
- The paper
- Raymaekers, K., Ponet, L., Holtappels, D., Berckmans, B., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020). Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review. Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.