Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review

Open access
Raymaekers, Katrijn, Ponet, Lisa, Holtappels, Dominique, Berckmans, Barbara, Cammue, Bruno P.A.·2020·Biological Control

Abstract

Abstract In current plant disease control, the divergence from chemical pesticide use has been fueled by the public concern about toxicity and environmental impact of these products, the development of pesticide-resistant pathogens, a rising ban of existing pesticides and, a decreased registration of new ones. Due its high potential as alternative/complement to these pesticides, biological disease control is now generally recognized and constitute an important tool in integrated pest management (IPM). However, one of the factors hampering the large-scale implementation of biocontrol is the lack of efficient, commercially available biocontrol agents (BCAs). The identification of novel BCAs thus forms a critical step in the development of commercial biocontrol products and requires rapid and robust screening methods suitable to evaluate high numbers of candidate BCAs. In this review, we present an overview and discussion of the screening systems reported to select novel BCAs for biocontrol of microbial plant diseases. Distinction is made between screenings for BCAs with direct antagonistic effect on the pathogen (via e.g. parasitism, antibiosis, or competition) and BCAs that exert their biocontrol activity indirectly by induction in the plant of an induced systemic resistance (ISR) to the pathogen. For both types, we further discriminate between phenotype- and marker-based approaches, which evaluate directly the intended phenotype (disease reduction) or the expression of a marker predictive for this phenotype, respectively. Finally, we discuss the importance of the type and origin of candidate BCA collections as a significant determinant of the screening success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 161 references

Metadata

Authors
Raymaekers, K., Ponet, L., Holtappels, D., Berckmans, B., & Cammue, B. P. A.
Venue
Biological Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
144
Pages
104240
ISSN
1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011088472
Cited by
367
References
161
FWCI
28.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240
The paper
Raymaekers, K., Ponet, L., Holtappels, D., Berckmans, B., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020). Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review. Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.