The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary ecology of plant–microbe interactions: soil microbial structure alters selection on plant traits
Open accessAbstract
• Below-ground microbial communities influence plant diversity, plant productivity, and plant community composition. Given these strong ecological effects, are interactions with below-ground microbes also important for understanding natural selection on plant traits? • Here, we manipulated below-ground microbial communities and the soil moisture environment on replicated populations of Brassica rapa to examine how microbial community structure influences selection on plant traits and mediates plant responses to abiotic environmental stress. • In soils with experimentally simplified microbial communities, plants were smaller, had reduced chlorophyll content, produced fewer flowers, and were less fecund when compared with plant populations grown in association with more complex soil microbial communities. Selection on plant growth and phenological traits also was stronger when plants were grown in simplified, less diverse soil microbial communities, and these effects typically were consistent across soil moisture treatments. • Our results suggest that microbial community structure affects patterns of natural selection on plant traits. Thus, the below-ground microbial community can influence evolutionary processes, just as recent studies have demonstrated that microbial diversity can influence plant community and ecosystem processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress
Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C.-M. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 · Cited by 1,852
Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution
Zilber-Rosenberg, I., & Rosenberg, E. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x · Cited by 1,739
The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services
Bell, T., Newman, J. A., Silverman, B. W., Turner, S. L., & Lilley, A. K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03891 · Cited by 950
Cited by
Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility
Chaparro, J. M., Sheflin, A. M., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M. (2012) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-012-0691-4 · Cited by 1,099
Functional Soil Microbiome: Belowground Solutions to an Aboveground Problem
Lakshmanan, V., Selvaraj, G., & Bais, H. P. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.245811 · Cited by 400
O’Brien, A. M., Laurich, J. R., & Frederickson, M. E. (2024) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpad183 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Lau, J. A., & Lennon, J. T.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-10
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 215-224
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2089061833
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary ecology of plant–microbe interactions: soil microbial structure alters selection on plant traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03790.x
- The paper
- Lau, J. A., & Lennon, J. T. (2011). Evolutionary ecology of plant–microbe interactions: soil microbial structure alters selection on plant traits. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03790.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.