The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Limitation of grain crop productivity by phosphorus (P) is widespread and will probably increase in the future. Enhanced P efficiency can be achieved by improved uptake of phosphate from soil (P‐acquisition efficiency) and by improved productivity per unit P taken up (P‐use efficiency). This review focuses on improved P‐use efficiency, which can be achieved by plants that have overall lower P concentrations, and by optimal distribution and redistribution of P in the plant allowing maximum growth and biomass allocation to harvestable plant parts. Significant decreases in plant P pools may be possible, for example, through reductions of superfluous ribosomal RNA and replacement of phospholipids by sulfolipids and galactolipids. Improvements in P distribution within the plant may be possible by increased remobilization from tissues that no longer need it (e.g. senescing leaves) and reduced partitioning of P to developing grains. Such changes would prolong and enhance the productive use of P in photosynthesis and have nutritional and environmental benefits. Research considering physiological, metabolic, molecular biological, genetic and phylogenetic aspects of P‐use efficiency is urgently needed to allow significant progress to be made in our understanding of this complex trait. Contents Summary 306 I. The need to use phosphorus efficiently 307 II. P‐use efficiency and P dynamics in a growing crop 307 III. P pools in plants 307 IV. Phosphorus pools and growth rates 310 V. Are crops different from other plants in their P concentration? 310 VI. Phosphorus use and photosynthesis 311 VII. Crop development and canopy P distribution 312 VIII. Internal redistribution of P in a growing vegetative plant 313 IX. Allocation of P to reproductive structures 314 X. Constraints to P remobilisation 315 XI. Do physiological or phylogenetic trade‐offs constrain traits that could improve PUE? 316 XII. Identifying genetic loci associated with PUE 316 XIII. Conclusions 317 Acknowledgements 317 References 317
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Self-citationThe story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought
Cordell, D., Drangert, J.-O., & White, S. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009 · Cited by 5,171
Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants
(2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63043-9 · Cited by 4,337
Plant Physiological Ecology: Field methods and instrumentation
(2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-9013-1 · Cited by 3,294
The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns
Aerts, R., & Chapin, F. S. (1999) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60016-1 · Cited by 2,885
Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Garnier, E., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B. B., Lee, W., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., et al. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x · Cited by 2,598
N : P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance
Güsewell, S. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x · Cited by 2,411
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S., & Pons, T. L. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3 · Cited by 2,317
Self-citationWhite, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x · Cited by 2,178
Self-citationImproving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206 · Cited by 1,902
Cited by
Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review
Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs285 · Cited by 617
Revisiting fertilisers and fertilisation strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants
Bindraban, P. S., Dimkpa, C., Nagarajan, L., Roy, A., & Rabbinge, R. (2015) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-015-1039-7 · Cited by 485
Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants
Zhang, Z., Liao, H., & Lucas, W. J. (2014) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12163 · Cited by 441
Potassium and phosphorus transport and signaling in plants
Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Wu, W. (2021) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13053 · Cited by 431
Phosphorus resources, their depletion and conservation, a review
Reijnders, L. (2014) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.006 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Veneklaas, E. J., Lambers, H., Bragg, J., Finnegan, P. M., Lovelock, C. E., Plaxton, W. C., Price, C. A., Scheible, W., Shane, M. W., White, P. J., & Raven, J. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-12
- Volume
- 195
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-320
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2146027032
- Cited by
- 981
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 43.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x
- The paper
- Veneklaas, E. J., Lambers, H., Bragg, J., Finnegan, P. M., Lovelock, C. E., Plaxton, W. C., Price, C. A., Scheible, W., Shane, M. W., White, P. J., & Raven, J. A. (2012). Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.