Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 981

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants

Open access
Veneklaas, Erik J., Lambers, Hans, Bragg, Jason, Finnegan, Patrick M., Lovelock, Catherine E., Plaxton, William C., Price, Charles A., Scheible, Wolf‐Rüdiger, Shane, Michael W., White, Philip J., Raven, John A.·2012·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Limitation of grain crop productivity by phosphorus (P) is widespread and will probably increase in the future. Enhanced P efficiency can be achieved by improved uptake of phosphate from soil (P‐acquisition efficiency) and by improved productivity per unit P taken up (P‐use efficiency). This review focuses on improved P‐use efficiency, which can be achieved by plants that have overall lower P concentrations, and by optimal distribution and redistribution of P in the plant allowing maximum growth and biomass allocation to harvestable plant parts. Significant decreases in plant P pools may be possible, for example, through reductions of superfluous ribosomal RNA and replacement of phospholipids by sulfolipids and galactolipids. Improvements in P distribution within the plant may be possible by increased remobilization from tissues that no longer need it (e.g. senescing leaves) and reduced partitioning of P to developing grains. Such changes would prolong and enhance the productive use of P in photosynthesis and have nutritional and environmental benefits. Research considering physiological, metabolic, molecular biological, genetic and phylogenetic aspects of P‐use efficiency is urgently needed to allow significant progress to be made in our understanding of this complex trait. Contents Summary 306 I. The need to use phosphorus efficiently 307 II. P‐use efficiency and P dynamics in a growing crop 307 III. P pools in plants 307 IV. Phosphorus pools and growth rates 310 V. Are crops different from other plants in their P concentration? 310 VI. Phosphorus use and photosynthesis 311 VII. Crop development and canopy P distribution 312 VIII. Internal redistribution of P in a growing vegetative plant 313 IX. Allocation of P to reproductive structures 314 X. Constraints to P remobilisation 315 XI. Do physiological or phylogenetic trade‐offs constrain traits that could improve PUE? 316 XII. Identifying genetic loci associated with PUE 316 XIII. Conclusions 317 Acknowledgements 317 References 317

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Cited by

See all 981

Metadata

Authors
Veneklaas, E. J., Lambers, H., Bragg, J., Finnegan, P. M., Lovelock, C. E., Plaxton, W. C., Price, C. A., Scheible, W., Shane, M. W., White, P. J., & Raven, J. A.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-12
Volume
195
Issue
2
Pages
306-320
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2146027032
Cited by
981
References
108
FWCI
43.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x
The paper
Veneklaas, E. J., Lambers, H., Bragg, J., Finnegan, P. M., Lovelock, C. E., Plaxton, W. C., Price, C. A., Scheible, W., Shane, M. W., White, P. J., & Raven, J. A. (2012). Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.