The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales
Abstract
• Nutrient resorption is a fundamental process through which plants withdraw nutrients from leaves before abscission. Nutrient resorption patterns have the potential to reflect gradients in plant nutrient limitation and to affect a suite of terrestrial ecosystem functions. • Here, we used a stoichiometric approach to assess patterns in foliar resorption at a variety of scales, specifically exploring how N : P resorption ratios relate to presumed variation in N and/or P limitation and possible relationships between N : P resorption ratios and soil nutrient availability. • N : P resorption ratios varied significantly at the global scale, increasing with latitude and decreasing with mean annual temperature and precipitation. In general, tropical sites (absolute latitudes < 23°26') had N : P resorption ratios of < 1, and plants growing on highly weathered tropical soils maintained the lowest N : P resorption ratios. Resorption ratios also varied with forest age along an Amazonian forest regeneration chronosequence and among species in a diverse Costa Rican rain forest. • These results suggest that variations in N : P resorption stoichiometry offer insight into nutrient cycling and limitation at a variety of spatial scales, complementing other metrics of plant nutrient biogeochemistry. The extent to which the stoichiometric flexibility of resorption will help regulate terrestrial responses to global change merits further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Elser, J. J., Bracken, M. E. S., Cleland, E. E., Gruner, D. S., Harpole, W. S., Hillebrand, H., Ngai, J. T., Seabloom, E. W., Shurin, J. B., & Smith, J. E. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x · Cited by 4,574
The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants
Chapin, F. S. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001313 · Cited by 4,219
The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns
Aerts, R., & Chapin, F. S. (1999) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60016-1 · Cited by 2,885
NITROGEN LIMITATION OF NET PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS IS GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED
LeBauer, D. S., & Treseder, K. K. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-2057.1 · Cited by 2,766
Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z., & Chadwick, O. A. (2010) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-0127.1 · Cited by 2,729
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Weaver, T., & Grime, J. P. (1980) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898436 · Cited by 2,548
N : P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance
Güsewell, S. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x · Cited by 2,411
The Vegetation N:P Ratio: a New Tool to Detect the Nature of Nutrient Limitation
Koerselman, W., & Meuleman, A. F. M. (1996) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404783 · Cited by 2,131
Cited by
C:N:P stoichiometry in Australian soils with respect to vegetation and environmental factors
Bui, E. N., & Henderson, B. L. (2013) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1823-9 · Cited by 290
Pellegrini, A. F. A., Hedin, L. O., Staver, A. C., & Govender, N. (2015) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/14-1158.1 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, S. C., Townsend, A. R., Davidson, E. A., & Cleveland, C. C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-07
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 173-180
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2165485061
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 18.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04249.x
- The paper
- Reed, S. C., Townsend, A. R., Davidson, E. A., & Cleveland, C. C. (2012). Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04249.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.