Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,729

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions

Vitousek, Peter M., Porder, Stephen, Houlton, Benjamin Z., Chadwick, Oliver A.·2010·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Nutrient limitation to primary productivity and other biological processes is widespread in terrestrial ecosystems, and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are the most common limiting elements, both individually and in combination. Mechanisms that drive P limitation, and their interactions with the N cycle, have received less attention than mechanisms causing N limitation. We identify and discuss six mechanisms that could drive P limitation in terrestrial ecosystems. The best known of these is depletion‐driven limitation, in which accumulated P losses during long‐term soil and ecosystem development contribute to what Walker and Syers termed a “terminal steady state” of profound P depletion and limitation. The other mechanisms are soil barriers that prevent access to P; transactional limitation, in which weathering of P‐containing minerals does not keep pace with the supply of other resources; low‐P parent materials; P sinks; and anthropogenic changes that increase the supply of other resources (often N) relative to P. We distinguish proximate nutrient limitation (which occurs where additions of a nutrient stimulate biological processes, especially productivity) from ultimate nutrient limitation (where additions of a nutrient can transform ecosystems). Of the mechanisms that drive P limitation, we suggest that depletion, soil barriers, and low‐P parent material often cause ultimate limitation because they control the ecosystem mass balance of P. Similarly, demand‐independent losses and constraints to N fixation can control the ecosystem‐level mass balance of N and cause it to be an ultimate limiting nutrient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/08-0127.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 2,729

Metadata

Authors
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z., & Chadwick, O. A.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
5-15
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W1982837210
Cited by
2,729
References
2
FWCI
112.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/08-0127.1
The paper
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z., & Chadwick, O. A. (2010). Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0127.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.