The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops
Abstract
Summary: Domesticated food crops are derived from a phylogenetically diverse assemblage of wild ancestors through artificial selection for different traits. Our understanding of domestication, however, is based upon a subset of well‐studied ‘model’ crops, many of them from the Poaceae family. Here, we investigate domestication traits and theories using a broader range of crops. We reviewed domestication information (e.g. center of domestication, plant traits, wild ancestors, domestication dates, domestication traits, early and current uses) for 203 major and minor food crops. Compiled data were used to test classic and contemporary theories in crop domestication. Many typical features of domestication associated with model crops, including changes in ploidy level, loss of shattering, multiple origins, and domestication outside the native range, are less common within this broader dataset. In addition, there are strong spatial and temporal trends in our dataset. The overall time required to domesticate a species has decreased since the earliest domestication events. The frequencies of some domestication syndrome traits (e.g. nonshattering) have decreased over time, while others (e.g. changes to secondary metabolites) have increased. We discuss the influences of the ecological, evolutionary, cultural and technological factors that make domestication a dynamic and ongoing process. Contents Summary 29 I. Introduction 30 II. Key concepts and definitions 30 III. Methods of review and analysis 35 IV. Trends identified from the review of 203 crops 37 V. Life cycle 38 VI. Ploidy level 40 VII. Reproductive strategies 42 VIII. The domestication syndrome 42 IX. Spatial and temporal trends 42 X. Utilization of plant parts 44 XI. Conclusions 44 Acknowledgements 45 References 45
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farmers and Their Languages: The First Expansions
Diamond, J., & Bellwood, P. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078208 · Cited by 1,054
Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species?
(2007) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/25065732 · Cited by 452
Documenting domestication: The intersection of genetics and archaeology
Zeder, M. A., Emshwiller, E., Smith, B. D., & Bradley, D. G. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007 · Cited by 447
Vigne, J.-D. (2011) · Comptes Rendus Biologies · doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.009 · Cited by 416
A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants
Domingo, J. L., & Giné Bordonaba, J. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.003 · Cited by 272
Cited by
Challenges towards revitalizing hemp: A multifaceted crop
Schluttenhofer, C., & Yuan, L. (2017) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.004 · Cited by 348
How People Domesticated Amazonian Forests
Levis, C., Flores, B. M., Moreira, P. A., Luize, B. G., Alves, R. P., Franco-Moraes, J., Lins, J., Konings, E., Peña-Claros, M., Bongers, F., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00171 · Cited by 331
Global agricultural intensification during climate change: a role for genomics
Abberton, M., Batley, J., Bentley, A., Bryant, J., Cai, H., Cockram, J., Costa de Oliveira, A., Cseke, L. J., Dempewolf, H., De Pace, C., et al. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12467 · Cited by 284
Prohens, J., Gramazio, P., Plazas, M., Dempewolf, H., Kilian, B., Díez, M. J., Fita, A., Herraiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A., Soler, S., et al. (2017) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-017-1938-9 · Cited by 206
Disentangling Domestication from Food Production Systems in the Neotropics
Clement, C. R., Casas, A., Parra-Rondinel, F. A., Levis, C., Peroni, N., Hanazaki, N., Cortés-Zárraga, L., Rangel-Landa, S., Alves, R. P., Ferreira, M. J., et al. (2021) · Quaternary · doi:10.3390/quat4010004 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, R. S., DuVal, A. E., & Jensen, H. R.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-13
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-48
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1910920621
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04253.x
- The paper
- Meyer, R. S., DuVal, A. E., & Jensen, H. R. (2012). Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04253.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.