Cited by 272Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural safety and regulationsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants

Domingo, José L., Giné Bordonaba, Jordi·2011·Environment International

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a notable concern on the safety of genetically modified (GM) foods/plants, an important and complex area of research, which demands rigorous standards. Diverse groups including consumers and environmental Non Governmental Organizations (NGO) have suggested that all GM foods/plants should be subjected to long-term animal feeding studies before approval for human consumption. In 2000 and 2006, we reviewed the information published in international scientific journals, noting that the number of references concerning human and animal toxicological/health risks studies on GM foods/plants was very limited. The main goal of the present review was to assess the current state-of-the-art regarding the potential adverse effects/safety assessment of GM plants for human consumption. The number of citations found in databases (PubMed and Scopus) has dramatically increased since 2006. However, new information on products such as potatoes, cucumber, peas or tomatoes, among others was not available. Corn/maize, rice, and soybeans were included in the present review. An equilibrium in the number research groups suggesting, on the basis of their studies, that a number of varieties of GM products (mainly maize and soybeans) are as safe and nutritious as the respective conventional non-GM plant, and those raising still serious concerns, was currently observed. Nevertheless, it should be noted that most of these studies have been conducted by biotechnology companies responsible of commercializing these GM plants. These findings suggest a notable advance in comparison with the lack of studies published in recent years in scientific journals by those companies. All this recent information is herein critically reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.003

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several groups reviewing the evidence for health hazards of genetic modification have found no evidence for harms, but methods for such evaluation remain heterogeneous.

    “Several groups reviewing the evidence for health hazards of genetic modification have found no evidence for harms;130-134 however, methods for such evaluation remain heterogeneous.135-139”
  • A detailed analysis of the data in the subchronic toxicity studies has revealed statistically significant alterations in kidney and liver function that may constitute signs of the early onset of chronic toxicity.

    “A detailed analysis of the data in the subchronic toxicity studies [2–5] has revealed statistically significant alterations in kidney and liver function that may constitute signs of the early onset of chronic toxicity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domingo, J. L., & Giné Bordonaba, J.
Affiliations
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (ES)
Corresponding author
Domingo, José L.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
734-742
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166082387
Cited by
272
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
transgenic plants, GM food safety, safety assessment, toxicological risk assessment, maize, soybean, rice
MeSH terms
Animals, Consumer Product Safety, Zea mays, Humans, Solanum tuberosum, Oryza, Glycine max, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pisum sativum, Solanum lycopersicum, Cucumis sativus, Risk Assessment, Plants, Genetically Modified, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review