The DOI matches its Crossref record; 174 of the 174 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The resilience and functional role of moss in boreal and arctic ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Mosses in northern ecosystems are ubiquitous components of plant communities, and strongly influence nutrient, carbon and water cycling. We use literature review, synthesis and model simulations to explore the role of mosses in ecological stability and resilience. Moss community responses to disturbance showed all possible responses (increases, decreases, no change) within most disturbance categories. Simulations from two process‐based models suggest that northern ecosystems would need to experience extreme perturbation before mosses were eliminated. But simulations with two other models suggest that loss of moss will reduce soil carbon accumulation primarily by influencing decomposition rates and soil nitrogen availability. It seems clear that mosses need to be incorporated into models as one or more plant functional types, but more empirical work is needed to determine how to best aggregate species. We highlight several issues that have not been adequately explored in moss communities, such as functional redundancy and singularity, relationships between response and effect traits, and parameter vs conceptual uncertainty in models. Mosses play an important role in several ecosystem processes that play out over centuries – permafrost formation and thaw, peat accumulation, development of microtopography – and there is a need for studies that increase our understanding of slow, long‐term dynamical processes. Contents Summary 49 I. Mosses in the northern, high‐latitude region 50 II. The role of moss in ecological resilience 51 III. Response of moss to disturbance 54 IV. Future research needs 60 V. Conclusions 62 Acknowledgements 62 References 62
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Holling, C. S. (1973) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · Cited by 18,995
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
The NCEP–NCAR 50–Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD–ROM and Documentation
Kistler, R. E., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G. H., Woollen, J. S., Kalnay, E., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Kanamitsu, M., Kousky, V. E., et al. (2001) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0247:tnnyrm>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 4,212
(2002) · Cited by 3,806
Lavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
Special report on emissions scenarios
Nakićenović, N., Alcamo, J. M., Davis, G. F., de Vries, B. J. M., Fenhann, J. V., Gaffin, S. R., Gregory, K., Griibler, A., Jung, T. Y., Kram, T., et al. (2000) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3,423
Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis
Yachi, S., & Loreau, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463 · Cited by 3,211
The diversity–stability debate
McCann, K. S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012234 · Cited by 3,143
Cited by
Wullschleger, S. D., Epstein, H. E., Box, E. O., Euskirchen, E. S., Goswami, S., Iversen, C. M., Kattge, J., Norby, R. J., van Bodegom, P. M., & Xu, X. (2014) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu077 · Cited by 313
Self-citationEffects of water level alteration on carbon cycling in peatlands
Zhong, Y., Jiang, M., & Middleton, B. A. (2020) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1080/20964129.2020.1806113 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Turetsky, M. R., Bond‐Lamberty, B., Euskirchen, E., Talbot, J., Frolking, S., McGuire, A. D., & Tuittila, E.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-24
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-67
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2106963423
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 174
- FWCI
- 16.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The resilience and functional role of moss in boreal and arctic ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04254.x
- The paper
- Turetsky, M. R., Bond‐Lamberty, B., Euskirchen, E., Talbot, J., Frolking, S., McGuire, A. D., & Tuittila, E. (2012). The resilience and functional role of moss in boreal and arctic ecosystems. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04254.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.