Cited by 54Children's Physical and Motor DevelopmentCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency for identifying children with motor impairment

Open access
Venetsanou, Fotini, Kambas, Antonis, Aggeloussis, Nickos, Serbezis, Vasilios, Taxildaris, Kyriakos·2007·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

This study compared the consistency of the Short Form (SF) and the Long Form (LF) of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP) in identifying preschool children with motor impairment (MI). One hundred and forty-four Greek preschool children participated (74 males, 70 females; mean age 5 y 2 mo [SD 5 mo], range 4 y 6 mo-5 y 6 mo). Although total SF and LF scores were highly correlated (r=0.85), paired t-tests indicated significant differences (t=-27.466, p=0.001). SF total scores (mean 58.72 [SD 7.28]) were higher than LF total scores (mean 47.38 [SD 9.43]). SF had low sensitivity (13.6%) and negative predictive value (72.5%) for identifying MI. The BOTMP-SF does not appear to be a valid test for the identification of MI in 5-year-old children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00846.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychomotor development scores in adopted children were generally found to be higher 6 months after adoption than at the time of adoption.

    “psychomotor development scores in adopted children were generally found to be higher 6 months after adoption than at the time of adoption,25”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Miles B, Nierengarten M, Nearing R. (1988) A review of the eleven most often-cited assessment instruments used in adapted physical education. Clin Kinesiol 42: 33-41.
  2. McCarron LT. (1982) MAND McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development, Fine and Gross Motor Abilities. Revised edn. Dallas, TX: Common Market Press.
  3. Proviadaki E. (2004) A motor development research in childhood using the BOTMP. (Dissertation). University of Thrace.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venetsanou, F., Kambas, A., Aggeloussis, N., Serbezis, V., & Taxildaris, K.
Affiliations
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Corresponding author
Venetsanou, Fotini
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-26
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
846-848
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W1964297304
Cited by
54
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, motor impairment, preschool children, test sensitivity, negative predictive value, test validity, motor function assessment, Greek children
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Motor Skills Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review