Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 879

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy: Developing a Communication Classification System

Open access
HIDECKER, MARY JO COOLEY, PANETH, NIGEL, ROSENBAUM, PETER L, KENT, RAYMOND D, LILLIE, JANET, EULENBERG, JOHN B, CHESTER JR, KEN, JOHNSON, BRENDA, MICHALSEN, LAUREN, EVATT, MORGAN, TAYLOR, KARA·2011·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to create and validate the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) for children with cerebral palsy (CP), for use by a wide variety of individuals who are interested in CP. This paper reports the content validity, interrater reliability, and test-retest reliability of the CFCS for children with CP. METHOD: An 11-member development team created comprehensive descriptions of the CFCS levels, and four nominal groups comprising 27 participants critiqued these levels. Within a Delphi survey, 112 participants commented on the clarity and usefulness of the CFCS. Interrater reliability was completed by 61 professionals and 68 parents/relatives who classified 69 children with CP aged 2 to 18 years. Test-retest reliability was completed by 48 professionals who allowed at least 2 weeks between classifications. The participants who assessed the CFCS were all relevant stakeholders: adults with CP, parents of children with CP, educators, occupational therapists, physical therapists, physicians, and speech-language pathologists. RESULTS: The interrater reliability of the CFCS was 0.66 between two professionals and 0.49 between a parent and a professional. Professional interrater reliability improved to 0.77 for classification of children older than 4 years. The test-retest reliability was 0.82. INTERPRETATION: The CFCS demonstrates content validity and shows very good test-retest reliability, good professional interrater reliability, and moderate parent-professional interrater reliability. Combining the CFCS with the Gross Motor Function Classification System and the Manual Ability Classification System contributes to a functional performance view of daily life for individuals with CP, in accordance with the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 879

Metadata

Authors
HIDECKER, M. J. C., PANETH, N., ROSENBAUM, P. L., KENT, R. D., LILLIE, J., EULENBERG, J. B., CHESTER JR, K., JOHNSON, B., MICHALSEN, L., EVATT, M., & TAYLOR, K.
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-27
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
704-710
ISSN
0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1589750505
Cited by
879
References
2
FWCI
14.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy: Developing a Communication Classification System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
The paper
HIDECKER, M. J. C., PANETH, N., ROSENBAUM, P. L., KENT, R. D., LILLIE, J., EULENBERG, J. B., CHESTER JR, K., JOHNSON, B., MICHALSEN, L., EVATT, M., & TAYLOR, K. (2011). Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy: Developing a Communication Classification System. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.