The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding performance deficits in developmental coordination disorder: a meta‐analysis of recent research
Abstract
Aim Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a significant disorder of childhood, characterized by core difficulties in learning fine and/or gross motor skills, and the attendant psychosocial problems. The aim of the meta‐analysis presented here (the first on DCD since 1998) was to summarize trends in the literature over the past 14 years and to identify and describe the main motor control and cognitive deficits that best discriminate children with DCD from those without. Method A systematic review of the literature published between January 1997 and August 2011 was conducted. All available journal papers reporting a comparison between a group of children with DCD and a group of typically developing children on behavioural measures were included. Results One hundred and twenty‐nine studies yielded 1785 effect sizes based on a total of 2797 children with DCD and 3407 typically developing children. Across all outcome measures, a moderate to large effect size was found, suggesting a generalized performance deficit in children with DCD. The pattern of deficits suggested several areas of pronounced difficulty, including internal (forward) modelling, rhythmic coordination, executive function, gait and postural control, catching and interceptive action, and aspects of sensoriperceptual function. Interpretation The results suggest that the predictive control of action may be a fundamental disruption in DCD, along with the ability to develop stable coordination patterns. Implications for theory development and intervention are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blank, R., Barnett, A. L., Cairney, J., Green, D., Kirby, A., Polatajko, H., Rosenblum, S., Smits‐Engelsman, B., Sugden, D., Wilson, P., et al. (2019) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.14132 · Cited by 836
Self-citationWilson, P. H., Smits‐Engelsman, B., Caeyenberghs, K., Steenbergen, B., Sugden, D., Clark, J., Mumford, N., & Blank, R. (2017) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.13530 · Cited by 308
Self-citationBiotteau, M., Danna, J., Baudou, E., Puyjarinet, F., Velay, J.-L., Albaret, J.-M., & Chaix, Y. (2019) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s120514 · Cited by 123
Miller, H. L., Caçola, P. M., Sherrod, G. M., Patterson, R. M., & Bugnariu, N. L. (2019) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.038 · Cited by 53
A multidimensional approach to the study of emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders
Xavier, J., Vignaud, V., Ruggiero, R., Bodeau, N., Cohen, D., & Chaby, L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01954 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- WILSON, P. H., RUDDOCK, S., SMITS‐ENGELSMAN, B., POLATAJKO, H., & BLANK, R.
- Venue
- Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-29
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-228
- ISSN
- 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8749
- OpenAlex
- W2076371744
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding performance deficits in developmental coordination disorder: a meta‐analysis of recent research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04436.x
- The paper
- WILSON, P. H., RUDDOCK, S., SMITS‐ENGELSMAN, B., POLATAJKO, H., & BLANK, R. (2013). Understanding performance deficits in developmental coordination disorder: a meta‐analysis of recent research. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04436.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.