Cited by 127Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Music Perception

Cognitive Modulation of Time‐Dependent Primary Bradycardia

Lacey, Beatrice C., Lacey, John I.·1980·Psychophysiology

Abstract

In one experiment, 60 male college students counted silently the number of rarely presented tones embedded in a sequence of “standard” tones. The tones differed by 50 Hz. Both rare and standard tones produced a primary bradycardia which exhibited time‐dependency: Stimuli which happened to fall relatively early in the cardiac cycle prolonged the duration of that very cycle more than late‐occurring stimuli. The latter slowed the subsequent cardiac cycle. These effects are identical qualitatively with those found in acute animal experiments upon direct electrical stimulation of the vagus, and they verified and extended results from previous experiments with human subjects in response to other sensorimotor events. The effects of expectancy, evaluated by serial positional effects on the magnitude and slope of time‐dependent cardiac slowing, were different for standard and for rare tones. Comparisons with P300, the late positive component of the average evoked potential, suggest that while P300 is most strongly associated with poststimulus decisional processes, primary bradycardia and its time‐dependent aspects reflect both early stimulus registration and later decision making. The results suggest limbic and neocortical modulation of primary bradycardia. In a second experiment with 20 male college students, in which tones were presented at experimentally controlled times within the cardiac cycle, the basic effects obtained with post hoc separation of tones into relative cycle time…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00137.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac cycle duration is systematically modified by stimulus presentation and target detection, with a small but consistent change.

    “In perceptual and cognitive paradigms, cardiac cycle duration is also systematically modified 31-36 with a small but consistent change of cardiac cycle duration induced by stimulus presentation and target detection.”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lacey, B. C., & Lacey, J. I.
Affiliations
Wright State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lacey, Beatrice C.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-05
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
209-221
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W1996515999
Cited by
127
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
cardiac cycle, expectancy, P300, vagus nerve stimulation, decision-making, limbic system, neocortex, cardiac cycle timing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review