The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heart Beat Perception and Emotional Experience
Abstract
ABSTRACT The main assumption of the present study is that emotional experience is coupled to perception of bodily processes. From this it is deduced that individuals who show good perception of heart activity tend to exhibit higher levels of a momentarily experienced emotion (in this case anxiety) and to score higher on the personality trait “Emotional Lability.” The aspect of cardiac awareness considered here is perception of heart beats. Subjects were instructed to count heart beats (only by concentrating on their body but not by taking their pulse) during a signalled time interval and the reported number of beats was then compared to the actual number of beats as extracted from the EKG. Additionally, skin conductance and respiration were recorded. During the experimental task (i.e., counting heart beats) increases in heart rate, respiration rate and number of spontaneous fluctuations in skin conductance were recorded. Groups of good and poor perceivers were formed on the basis of accuracy on the perception task. The two groups did not differ in heart rate; however, in State Anxiety and Emotional Lability, the group of good perceivers had significantly higher scores. The importance of visceroception for emotional experience is pointed out and the relevance for clinical psychology is discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The extent to which beliefs about heart beat affect interoceptive accuracy estimates in the heartbeat counting task may depend on the task instructions given; whilst early instructions encouraged participants to ‘estimate’ if they could not feel their heartbeat (Brener and Ring, 2016; Schandry, 1981) more recent approaches advocate a response of zero in this instance (Murphy, Brewer, et al., 2018)”
From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Schandry, 1981
In the citing paper
“Much of this evidence utilises an individual differences approach to demonstrate that, across individuals, interoceptive accuracy is correlated with emotional lability (Rainer Schandry, 1981)”
From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Rainer Schandry, 1981
In the citing paper
“The HBD task is believed to be a reliable and valid quantifiable measure of IA (Whitehead and Drescher, 1980; Schandry, 1981), in which the participants are instructed to perceive his or her heartbeats without feeling for a pulse.”
From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Schandry, 1981
In the citing paper
“Greater interoceptive awareness is associated with increased anxiety and panic, especially when those bodily sensations are catastrophized (Schandry, 1981; Ehlers and Breuer, 1992; Barlow, 2002; Pollatos et al., 2009; Paulus and Stein, 2010) during self-referential processing, such as in worry (e.g., Pollatos et al., 2009; Paulus and Stein, 2010).”
From Distinct functional connectivities predict clinical response with emotion regulation therapy (2017) · cites this paper as Schandry, 1981
Citations
Cites
JAMES, W. (1884) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/os-ix.34.188 · Cited by 3,446
STAI manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory
Cd, S. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,433
Psychological stress : issues in research
Appley, M. H., & Trumbull, R. (1967) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · Cited by 747
Autonomic feedback: The perception of autonomic activity.
Mandler, G., Mandler, J. M., & Uviller, E. T. (1958) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0048083 · Cited by 316
Respiratory and heart rate components of attention.
Porges, S. W., & Raskin, D. C. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027921 · Cited by 173
Heart Rate Perception and Heart Rate Control
McFarland, R. A. (1975) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb00011.x · Cited by 134
Cardiac perception and cardiac control
Carroll, D. (1977) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/bf00998622 · Cited by 55
Brener, J. M. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2526-0_15 · Cited by 50
The role of interoception in learned visceral control
Gannon, L. R. (1977) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/bf00998621 · Cited by 26
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fahrenberg J., 1978, Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar, FPI
- Whitehead W. E., 1976, Lack of relationship between Autonomic Perception Questionnaire scores and actual sensitivity for perceiving one's heart beat, Psychophysiology, 13, 177
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self
Seth, A. K. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007 · Cited by 1,816
Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness
Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004 · Cited by 1,624
Visceral influences on brain and behavior
Critchley, H. D., & Harrison, N. A. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.008 · Cited by 1,177
Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work?
Lehrer, P. M., & Gevirtz, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756 · Cited by 883
Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans
Kleckner, I. R., Zhang, J., Touroutoglou, A., Chanes, L., Xia, C., Simmons, W. K., Quigley, K. S., Dickerson, B. C., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0069 · Cited by 641
Metadata
- Authors
- Schandry, R.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schandry, Rainer
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 483-488
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2104552834
- Cited by
- 1,335
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 88 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- visceral sensation, emotional experience, anxiety, emotional lability, state anxiety, skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, body awareness
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Perception, Personality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review