The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Publication Recommendations for Electrodermal Measurements
Open accessAbstract
The paper recommends an acceptable methodology for recording electrodermal activity which reflects a consensus of experts in the field. These recommendations are presented with a minimum of technical discussion in order to maximize their usefulness to investigators who are not specialists in this area. For most purposes, skin conductance (SC) is to be preferred over skin potential (SP). It is recommended that SC be recorded from palmar sites with silver‐silver chloride electrodes and an electrode paste consisting of a sodium chloride electrolyte in a neutral ointment cream medium. The area of contact with the skin should be controlled and time allowed for stabilization of the skin‐electrode paste interface. Electrode bias potentials and polarization should be monitored during use. Signal conditioning is achieved by the application of a constant 0.5 volt across the electrodes and measurement of the resultant current flow by amplifying the voltage developed across a small resistor in series with the skin. The measurement of the amplitude‐or even the detection‐of small responses requires some form of tonic level control, permitting an adjustment of the tonic level. A circuit is provided for signal conditioning and tonic level control. SP can be recorded with the same electrodes and electrode paste, unless the results are to be related to the British work on SP level, in which case the original potassium chloride electrolyte in an agar medium should be used. SP recordings require that one of the electrodes be placed over an inactive reference site, preferably over the ulnar bone near the elbow. No external voltage is applied, but some form of tonic level control may be needed. Electrodes need to be checked for bias potentials but not polarization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for Human Electromyographic Research
Fridlund, A. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00676.x · Cited by 1,737
Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements
Society for Psychophysiological Research Ad Hoc Committee on Electrodermal Measures (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.x · Cited by 1,288
Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology.
Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686 · Cited by 1,067
Review: Electrodermal Responses: What Happens in the Brain
Critchley, H. D. (2002) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840200800209 · Cited by 997
Lonsdorf, T. B., Menz, M. M., Andreatta, M., Fullana, M. A., Golkar, A., Haaker, J., Heitland, I., Hermann, A., Kuhn, M., Kruse, O., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026 · Cited by 837
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowles, D. C., Christie, M. J., Edelberg, R., GRINGS, W. W., Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 232-239
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2003697795
- Cited by
- 1,699
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Publication Recommendations for Electrodermal Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.x
- The paper
- Fowles, D. C., Christie, M. J., Edelberg, R., GRINGS, W. W., Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H. (1981). Publication Recommendations for Electrodermal Measurements. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.