Cited by 1,288Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlEmotion and Mood RecognitionStress Responses and Cortisol

Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements

Open access
Society for Psychophysiological Research Ad Hoc Committee on Electrodermal Measures·2012·Psychophysiology

Abstract

This committee was appointed by the SPR Board to provide recommendations for publishing data on electrodermal activity ( EDA ). They are intended to be a stand‐alone source for newcomers and experienced users. A short outline of principles for electrodermal measurement is given, and recommendations from an earlier report (Fowles et al., ) are incorporated. Three fundamental techniques of EDA recording are described: (1) endosomatic recording without the application of an external current, (2) exosomatic recording with direct current (the most widely applied methodology), and (3) exosomatic recording with alternating current—to date infrequently used but a promising future methodology. In addition to EDA recording in laboratories, ambulatory recording has become an emerging technique. Specific problems that come with this recording of EDA in the field are discussed, as are those emerging from recording EDA within a magnetic field (e.g., fMRI ). Recommendations for the details that should be mentioned in publications of EDA methods and results are provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.x

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrodermal activity provides an index of sympathetic nervous system activity because eccrine sweat glands are innervated by the sympathetic but not parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system.

    “Electrodermal activity is defined as the electrical conductivity between two electrodes on the skin over time; it provides an index of sympathetic nervous system activity since eccrine sweat glands are innervated by the sympathetic but not parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system (55).”

    From Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children Is Not Associated With Abnormal Autonomic Nervous System Function: Hypothesis and Theory (2022) · cites this paper as [55]

    Section 1.2 describes measuring changes in skin conductance, and Section 3.2 treats skin conductance measures as indices of sympathetic nervous system arousal. The cited paper does not state the sentence’s specific explanation that eccrine sweat glands have sympathetic but no parasympathetic innervation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The data quality was checked by examining whether each eligible record used an SCR extraction technique that matched the typical recommendations for the field.

    “The data quality was checked by examining whether each eligible record used an SCR extraction technique (70,71) that matched the typical recommendations for the field.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Boucsein, W., Schaefer, F., & Sommer, T. (2001). Electrodermal long-term monitoring in everyday life. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Progress in ambulatory assessment (pp. 549-560). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  2. Edelberg, R. (1967). Electrical properties of the skin. In C. C. Brown (Ed.), Methods in psychophysiology (pp. 1-53). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  3. Fowles, D. C. (1986). The eccrine system and electrodermal activity. In M. G. H. Coles, E. Donchin, & S. W. Porges (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications (pp. 51-96). Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland).
  4. Grimnes, S., & Martinsen, O. G. (2008). Bioimpedance and bioelectricity basics (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
  5. Grings, W. W. (1974). Recording of electrodermal phenomena. In R. F. Thompson & M. M. Patterson (Eds.), Methods in physiological psychology: Vol. 1. Bioelectric recording techniques, Part C: Receptor and effector processes (pp. 273-296). New York: Academic Press.
  6. Hamilton, R. J. (Ed.). (2012). Tarascon Pharmacopoeia 2012 Professional Desk Reference Edition. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
  7. Heller, H. C. (2005). Temperature, thermoregulations, and sleep. In M. H. Kryger, T. Roth, & W. C. Dement (Eds.), Prinicples and practice of sleep medicine (4th ed., pp. 292-304). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier
  8. Öhman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention and learning: An information processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. Van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  9. Siddle, D. A. T., Stephenson, D., & Spinks, J. A. (1983). Elicitation and habituation of the orienting response. In D. Siddle (Ed.), Orienting and habituation: Perspectives in human research (pp. 109-182). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  10. Martin & P. H. Venables (Eds.), Techniques in psychophysiology (pp. 3-67). New York: Wiley.
  11. Wenger, M. A., & Cullen, T. D. (1962). Some problems in psychophysi- ological research: III. The effects of uncontrolled variables. In R. Roessler & N. S. Greenfield (Eds.), Psychophysiological correlates of psychological disorder (pp. 106-114). Madison: University of Wiscon- sin Press.
  12. Wenger, M. A., & Cullen, T. D. (1972). Studies of autonomic balance in children and adults. In N. S. Greenfield & R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 535-569). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  13. Wilhelm, F. H., & Roth, W. T. (1996). Ambulatory assessment of clinical anxiety. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 317-345). Göttingen:

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Society for Psychophysiological Research Ad Hoc Committee on Electrodermal Measures
Corresponding author
Society for Psychophysiological Research Ad Hoc Committee on Electrodermal Measures
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-08
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
1017-1034
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W4242743388
Cited by
1,288
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
electrodermal activity, skin conductance, publication recommendations, magnetic interference, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Electromagnetic Fields, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Psychophysiology, Publications, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Artifacts, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review