The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autonomic cardiac control. III. Psychological stress and cardiac response in autonomic space as revealed by pharmacological blockades
Abstract
Behavioral contexts can evoke a variety of autonomic modes of response, characterized by reciprocal, coactive, or independent changes in the autonomic divisions. In the present study, we investigated the reactive autonomic control of the heart in response to psychological stressors, using quantitative methods for analyzing single and double autonomic blockades, and through the use of noninvasive indices based on heart period variability and systolic time intervals. Analysis of the effects of pharmacological blockades revealed an overall pattern of increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic control of the heart during speech stress, mental arithmetic, and a reaction‐time task. Unlike the classical reciprocal sympathetic‐parasympathetic response to orthostatic challenge, however, the responses of the autonomic branches to stress were uncorrelated. This reflected notable individual differences in the mode of autonomic response to stress, which had considerable stability across stress tasks. The putative noninvasive indices of sympathetic (preejection period) and parasympathetic (respiratory sinus arrhythmia) control changed in accord with the results of pharmacological blockades. Together, these results emphasize the substantial individual differences in the mode of autonomic response to stress, the advantages of a quantitative approach to analyzing blockade data, and the importance of validity estimates of blockade data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berntson, G. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Quigley, K. S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.459 · Cited by 819
Self-citationA critical review of the systolic time intervals.
Lewis, R. P., Rittogers, S. E., Froester, W. F., & Boudoulas, H. (1977) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.56.2.146 · Cited by 624
GROSSMAN, P., & KOLLAI, M. (1993) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02072.x · Cited by 250
Cited by
Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats
BERNTSON, G. G., THOMAS BIGGER, J., ECKBERG, D. L., GROSSMAN, P., KAUFMANN, P. G., MALIK, M., NAGARAJA, H. N., PORGES, S. W., SAUL, J. P., STONE, P. H., et al. (1997) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02140.x · Cited by 3,962
Self-citationStress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
Kim, H.-G., Cheon, E.-J., Bai, D.-S., Lee, Y. H., & Koo, B.-H. (2018) · Psychiatry Investigation · doi:10.30773/pi.2017.08.17 · Cited by 2,308
Loneliness and health: potential mechanisms
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Crawford, L. E., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M. H., Kowalewski, R. B., Malarkey, W. B., Van Cauter, E., & Berntson, G. G. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200205000-00005 · Cited by 1,149
Self-citationGrossman, P., & Taylor, E. W. (2007) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.014 · Cited by 1,133
Loneliness in everyday life: Cardiovascular activity, psychosocial context, and health behaviors.
Hawkley, L. C., Burleson, M. H., Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.105 · Cited by 608
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BERNTSON, G. G., CACIOPPO, J. T., BINKLEY, P. F., UCHINO, B. N., QUIGLEY, K. S., & FIELDSTONE, A.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 599-608
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2127412413
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
