The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internal and external barriers to eco‐conscious apparel acquisition
Abstract
Apparel consumption is a contributing cause of environmental change, and environmental integrity requires the encouragement of eco‐conscious apparel acquisition. Unfortunately, among consumers, there is limited engagement in this behaviour. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to expand the knowledge base of eco‐conscious apparel consumption and question the limited participation by identifying barriers that constrain consumers. This study used a qualitative approach to collect and analyse data from 26 eco‐conscious consumers. Data collection for the study occurred through semi‐structured interviews. Results indicate that consumers find it difficult to engage in eco‐conscious apparel acquisition on a consistent basis because a number of barriers stand in the way. These barriers include knowledge and attitudes about environmentally preferable apparel, availability of environmentally preferable apparel, economic resources, retail environments and societal norms. Consequently, the implication is that strategies intending to encourage eco‐conscious apparel acquisition should include a focus on diminishing these barriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising
Roberts, J. A. (1996) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6 · Cited by 1,603
Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916595275005 · Cited by 1,457
Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods
Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(94)00034-8 · Cited by 766
Cited by
Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015) · International Strategic Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 · Cited by 1,518
Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J., & Battenfeld, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320 · Cited by 330
Diddi, S., Yan, R.-N., Bloodhart, B., Bajtelsmit, V., & McShane, K. (2019) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.009 · Cited by 280
Varshneya, G., Pandey, S. K., & Das, G. (2017) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150916668620 · Cited by 214
Zhang, L., Fan, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11154222 · Cited by 206
“Some previous literature has verified that it had a positive effect on purchase intention for green products [12,26], while some researchers found that it had a negative effect [65,66].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Connell, K. Y. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Consumer Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-16
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-286
- ISSN
- 1470-6423 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-6431
- OpenAlex
- W2044068199
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internal and external barriers to eco‐conscious apparel acquisition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00865.x
- The paper
- Connell, K. Y. H. (2010). Internal and external barriers to eco‐conscious apparel acquisition. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00865.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.