The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth*
Abstract
Objective To establish the effect of childbirth on pudendal nerve function and identify obstetric factors associated with such damage. Design A prospective investigational study. Setting Antenatal clinic, St Bartholomew's (Homerton) Hospital. Subjects One hundred and twenty‐eight unselected pregnant women beyond 34 weeks’ gestation. Intervention Pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML) and perineal plane were measured during pregnancy and six to eight weeks after delivery, and remeasured in a subgroup (n= 22) at six months. Main outcome measures Effect of mode of delivery on PNTML and the plane of the perineum. Results Vaginal delivery resulted in a significant (P < 0.0001) prolongation of the mean PNTML bilaterally in both primipara (n= 57) 1.91 ms (SD 0.19) vs 2.00 ms (SD 0.22), antenatal vs postnatal, right PNTML; 1.96 ms (SD 0.21) vs 2.06 ms (SD 0.24) left PNTML, and multipara (n= 32) (P < 0.01). Perineal descent during straining was also increased after vaginal delivery (P < 0.001). Greater damage to the pudendal nerve occurred on the left side (P= 0.03). PNTML were not altered after elective caesarean section (n= 7), but were increased on the left side when caesarean section was performed during labour (1.94 ms (SD 0.13) vs 2.08 ms (SD 0.29), P < 0.01). A heavier baby and a longer active second stage of labour were both associated with significant prolongation of PNTML. Eight out of 12 women with a prolonged PNTML at six weeks had normal measurements when restudied six months after delivery. Conclusion Vaginal delivery, particularly the first, results in significant pelvic floor tissue stretching and pudendal nerve damage. Women who have a caesarean section during labour may also be at risk of pudendal nerve damage. The process of labour and vaginal delivery can both cause pudendal nerve damage which may be asymmetrical in extent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anal-Sphincter Disruption during Vaginal Delivery
Sultan, A. H., Kamm, M. A., Hudson, C. N., Thomas, J. M., & Bartram, C. I. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312233292601 · Cited by 1,533
Self-citationPelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study
ALLEN, R. E., HOSKER, G. L., SMITH, A. R. B., & WARRELL, D. W. (1990) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02570.x · Cited by 805
Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: A 5-year follow-up
Snooks, S. J., Swash, M., Mathers, S. E., & Henry, M. M. (1990) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800771213 · Cited by 610
Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse.
Parks, A. G., Swash, M., & Urich, H. (1977) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.18.8.656 · Cited by 552
Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation
Snooks, S. J., Swash, M., Henry, M. M., & Setchell, M. (1986) · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1007/bf01648831 · Cited by 421
The pelvic floor musculature in the descending perineum syndrome
Henry, M. M., Parks, A. G., & Swash, M. (1982) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800690813 · Cited by 326
Kiff, E. S., & Swash, M. (1984) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.47.8.820 · Cited by 187
Increase in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency with defaecation straining
Lubowski, D. Z., Swash, M., Nicholls, R. J., & Henry, M. M. (1988) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800751115 · Cited by 134
Relation between perineal descent and pudendal nerve damage in idiopathic faecal incontinence
Jones, P. N., Lubowski, D. Z., Swash, M., et al. (1987) · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1007/bf01647699 · Cited by 104
Rogers, J. E., Laurberg, S., Misiewicz, J. J., Henry, M. M., & Swash, M. (1989) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800760628 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Faecal incontinence after childbirth
MacArthur, C., Bick, D. E., & Keighley, M. R. B. (1997) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10648.x · Cited by 366
Rehabilitation of pelvic floor muscles utilizing trunk stabilization
Sapsford, R. (2004) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00131-0 · Cited by 289
Pathophysiology and management of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
Wiesel, P. H., Norton, C., Glickman, S., & Kamm, M. A. (2001) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/00042737-200104000-00025 · Cited by 121
Self-citationRisk factors for genital prolapse in non-hysterectomized women around menopause
(2000) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00285-2 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Sultan, A. H., Kamm, M. A., & Hudson, C. N.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-28
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2058263933
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 14.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13005.x
- The paper
- Sultan, A. H., Kamm, M. A., & Hudson, C. N. (1994). Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth*. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13005.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.