The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function
Abstract
Objective To determine the anatomical cure rate of posterior colporrhaphy and its effect on bowel and sexual function one to six years later. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting Urogynaecology Unit, St George's Hospital, London. Participants Two hundred and thirty‐one women who underwent posterior colporrhaphy. Main outcome measures Anatomical and symptomatic cure of rectocoele. Methods The charts of 231 women who underwent 244 posterior colporrhaphies between 1 January 1989 and 4 January 1994 were reviewed. One hundred and seventy one (74%) were interviewed; 140 (61%) were examined. Mean follow up time was 42.5 months (range 11–74). Results Two hundred and nine women had prior or concurrent vaginal and/or bladder neck surgery including 38 previous posterior colporrhaphies. Postoperatively prolapse symptoms due to rectocoele decreased (64%vs 31%). Constipation (22%vs 33%), incomplete bowel emptying (27%vs 38%), incontinence of faeces (4%vs 11%) and sexual dysfunction (18%vs 27%) increased. Those with incontinence of stool were more likely to have had two or more posterior colporrhaphies. Sixty‐two percent felt that they improved over all after surgery. Additional postoperative symptoms included: vaginal and/or perineal splinting (33%), soiling and/or inability to wipe clean (16%), rectal digitation (23%), incontinence of flatus (19%), and rectal and/or vaginal pain (22%). Thirty‐three women (24%) had large rectocoeles, seven of whom did not have impaired bowel emptying. Conclusions Posterior colporrhaphy corrects the vaginal defect in 76% of women. It does not necessarily correct and may contribute to bowel and sexual dysfunction, particularly in those requiring multiple procedures. The presence of the anatomical defect does not imply dysfunction. The prevalence of bowel symptoms suggests the need for close questioning about bowel habits and the selective use of bowel investigations for some women before surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barber, M. D., Walters, M. D., & Bump, R. C. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025 · Cited by 1,357
Jelovsek, J. E., Maher, C., & Barber, M. D. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60462-0 · Cited by 934
Milani, R., Salvatore, S., Soligo, M., Pifarotti, P., Meschia, M., & Cortese, M. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00332.x · Cited by 290
Pelvic Organ Prolapse: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 214
(2019) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003519 · Cited by 187
Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse
Mouritsen, L., & Larsen, J. P. (2003) · International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction · doi:10.1007/s00192-002-1024-1 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahn, M. A., & Stanton, S. L.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-86
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1999339376
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10654.x
- The paper
- Kahn, M. A., & Stanton, S. L. (1997). Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10654.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.