Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh

Milani, Rodolfo, Salvatore, Stefano, Soligo, Marco, Pifarotti, Paola, Meschia, Michele, Cortese, Marina·2005·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of prolene mesh on urinary, bowel and sexual function in prolapse surgery. Design Prospective observational study on consecutive women. Setting Two referral uorgynaecological units in Italy. Population Women requiring prolapse repair for anterior or posterior vaginal prolapse. Methods All women were assessed for urinary, bowel, prolapse symptoms and dyspareunia pre‐ and post‐operatively. Urodynamics was performed in selected cases. Surgery consisted of an anterior or posterior repair plus a prolene mesh. Follow up was after 1, 6 and 12 months. The ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. Main outcome measures Vaginal anatomical restoration, urinary, bowel and sexual function. Results We recruited 63 women (mean age 63 years) with a mean follow up of 17 months. Anatomically, the success rate was 94%. Thirty‐two women had an anterior repair. Among this group, the sexual activity rate did not alter but dyspareunia increased by 20%. Urge and stress incontinence did not change post‐operatively but urgency improved in 10% and 13% had vaginal erosion of the mesh. Thirty‐one women had a posterior repair. Among this group, sexual activity decreased by 12% and dyspareunia increased in 63%. Constipation improved in 15% and anal incontinence in 4%, and 6.5% of women had vaginal erosion of the mesh and one required mesh removal for pelvic abscess. Conclusions Although this study shows good anatomical results with the use of prolene mesh for prolapse repair, there was a high rate of morbidity. We believe that the use of prolene mesh should be abandoned.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00332.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Milani, R., Salvatore, S., Soligo, M., Pifarotti, P., Meschia, M., & Cortese, M.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
107-111
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1964369436
Cited by
290
References
22
FWCI
13.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00332.x
The paper
Milani, R., Salvatore, S., Soligo, M., Pifarotti, P., Meschia, M., & Cortese, M. (2005). Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00332.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.