The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer
Abstract
Objective To estimate the relative risk and lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in women with various categories of family history. Design A meta‐analysis of all published caseecontrol and cohort studies. Methods Pooled relative risk estimates were calculated for the caseecontrol studies, using the Mantel‐Haenzel method. These estimates were combined with the relative risks from the cohort studies. The pooled estimates of relative risk were used to estimate lifetime risks of ovarian cancer from age 15 Up to age 75, for various categories of family history. Main outcome measures Relative risks and lifetime risks of developing ovarian cancer were calculated for the categories of women with 1. an affected first degree relative; 2. an affected mother; 3. an affected sister; and 4. women with more than one affected relative. Results The relative risk to first degree relatives is 3.1 (95% CI 2.6–3.7). There is some evidence that this relative risk declines with age. The relative risk to mothers of cases 1.1 (95% CI 0.8–1.6) was lower than the relative risks to sisters: 3.8 (95% CI 2.9–5.1), and daughters: 6.0 (95% CI 3.0–11.9); the explanation of this difference is unclear. Conclusions Women with a family history of ovarian cancer have a substantially higher risk of developing ovarian cancer compared with women without such a history. However the risk is small for most categories of family history, except for the small number of individuals who have more than one affected relative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review
Brett M., R., Brett M., R., Jennifer B., P., Thomas A., S., Jennifer B., P., & Thomas A., S. (2017) · Cancer Biology & Medicine · doi:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0084 · Cited by 1,524
Mutations in BRIP1 confer high risk of ovarian cancer
Rafnar, T., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Sulem, P., Jonasdottir, A., Sigurdsson, A., Jonasdottir, A., Besenbacher, S., Lundin, P., Stacey, S. N., Gudmundsson, J., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.955 · Cited by 406
Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline
Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Norquist, B., Lacchetti, C., Armstrong, D., Grisham, R. N., Goodfellow, P. J., Kohn, E. C., Levine, D. A., Liu, J. F., Lu, K. H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.02960 · Cited by 381
A genome-wide association study identifies a new ovarian cancer susceptibility locus on 9p22.2
Study, A. C. (., Song, H., The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Ramus, S. J., Tyrer, J., Bolton, K. L., Gentry-Maharaj, A., Wozniak, E., Anton-Culver, H., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.424 · Cited by 313
Self-citationIdentification of six new susceptibility loci for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer
EMBRACE, Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Collaborators, G. S., Breast Cancer Family Registry, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian Cancer Investigators), Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Ramus, S. J., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3185 · Cited by 250
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stratton, J. F., Pharoah, P., Smith, S. K., Easton, D., & Ponder, B. A. J.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 493-499
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1973037195
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10148.x
- The paper
- Stratton, J. F., Pharoah, P., Smith, S. K., Easton, D., & Ponder, B. A. J. (1998). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10148.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.