Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer

Stratton, John F., Pharoah, Paul, Smith, Steven K., Easton, Doug, Ponder, Bruce A. J.·1998·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To estimate the relative risk and lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in women with various categories of family history. Design A meta‐analysis of all published caseecontrol and cohort studies. Methods Pooled relative risk estimates were calculated for the caseecontrol studies, using the Mantel‐Haenzel method. These estimates were combined with the relative risks from the cohort studies. The pooled estimates of relative risk were used to estimate lifetime risks of ovarian cancer from age 15 Up to age 75, for various categories of family history. Main outcome measures Relative risks and lifetime risks of developing ovarian cancer were calculated for the categories of women with 1. an affected first degree relative; 2. an affected mother; 3. an affected sister; and 4. women with more than one affected relative. Results The relative risk to first degree relatives is 3.1 (95% CI 2.6–3.7). There is some evidence that this relative risk declines with age. The relative risk to mothers of cases 1.1 (95% CI 0.8–1.6) was lower than the relative risks to sisters: 3.8 (95% CI 2.9–5.1), and daughters: 6.0 (95% CI 3.0–11.9); the explanation of this difference is unclear. Conclusions Women with a family history of ovarian cancer have a substantially higher risk of developing ovarian cancer compared with women without such a history. However the risk is small for most categories of family history, except for the small number of individuals who have more than one affected relative.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10148.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Stratton, J. F., Pharoah, P., Smith, S. K., Easton, D., & Ponder, B. A. J.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
493-499
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1973037195
Cited by
239
References
0
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10148.x
The paper
Stratton, J. F., Pharoah, P., Smith, S. K., Easton, D., & Ponder, B. A. J. (1998). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10148.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.