The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near‐miss
Abstract
Objective To test the application of a clinical definition of severe acute maternal morbidity. Design A one‐year prospective descriptive multi‐centre study. Setting Kalafong and Pretoria Academic hospitals, catering for the delivery of indigent women in the Pretoria Health Region. Methods A ‘near‐miss’ describes a patient with an acute organ system dysfunction, which if not treated appropriately, could result in death. The case notes of women fitting this definition and all maternal deaths were analysed and compared. Outcome measure Determine the primary obstetric factors and the organ systems that failed. Identification of episodes of sub‐standard care and missed opportunities. Results One hundred and forty‐seven near misses and 30 maternal deaths were identified. The commonest reasons for a near‐miss were: emergency hysterectomy in 42 women (29%); severe hypotension in 40 (27%); and pulmonary oedema in 24 (16%). The most common initiating obstetric conditions were hypertension in 38 women (26%); haemorrhage in 38 (26%); and abortion or puerperal sepsis in 29 (20%). The primary obstetric factors amongst the maternal deaths were: hypertension (33%); sepsis (27%); and maternal medical diseases (17%) in 10, 8 and 5 women respectively. Sub‐standard care was identified in 82 cases. Breakdown in the health care administration was identified in 33, and patient‐orientated missed opportunities on 34 occasions. Conclusions The definition of severe acute maternal morbidity identified nearly five times as many cases as maternal death. This definition allows for an effective audit system of maternal care because it is clinically based, the definition is robust and the cases identified reflect the pattern of maternal death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care
Say, L., Souza, J. P., & Pattinson, R. C. (2009) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007 · Cited by 961
Self-citationSay, L., Pattinson, R. C., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2004) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/1742-4755-1-3 · Cited by 468
Self-citationPrevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage
Al‐Zirqi, I., Vangen, S., Forsen, L., & Stray‐Pedersen, B. (2008) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01859.x · Cited by 441
Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study
Nyfløt, L. T., Sandven, I., Stray-Pedersen, B., Pettersen, S., Al-Zirqi, I., Rosenberg, M., Jacobsen, A. F., & Vangen, S. (2017) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1217-0 · Cited by 312
Maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: the contribution of ineffective blood transfusion services
Bates, I., Chapotera, G., McKew, S., & Van Den Broek, N. (2008) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01866.x · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Mantel, G. D., Buchmann, E., Rees, H., & Pattinson, R. C.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 985-990
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2065481000
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near‐miss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10262.x
- The paper
- Mantel, G. D., Buchmann, E., Rees, H., & Pattinson, R. C. (1998). Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near‐miss. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10262.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.