Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study

Open access
Nyfløt, Lill Trine, Sandven, Irene, Stray-Pedersen, Babill, Pettersen, Silje, Al-Zirqi, Iqbal, Rosenberg, Margit, Jacobsen, Anne Flem, Vangen, Siri·2017·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In high-income countries, the incidence of severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) has increased. This has important public health relevance because severe PPH is a leading cause of major maternal morbidity. However, few studies have identified risk factors for severe PPH within a contemporary obstetric cohort. METHODS: We performed a case-control study to identify risk factors for severe PPH among a cohort of women who delivered at one of three hospitals in Norway between 2008 and 2011. A case (severe PPH) was classified by an estimated blood loss ≥1500 mL or the need for blood transfusion for excessive postpartum bleeding. Using logistic regression, we applied a pragmatic strategy to identify independent risk factors for severe PPH. RESULTS: Among a total of 43,105 deliveries occurring between 2008 and 2011, we identified 1064 cases and 2059 random controls. The frequency of severe PPH was 2.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.32-2.62). The most common etiologies for severe PPH were uterine atony (60%) and placental complications (36%). The strongest risk factors were a history of severe PPH (adjusted OR (aOR) = 8.97, 95% CI: 5.25-15.33), anticoagulant medication (aOR = 4.79, 95% CI: 2.72-8.41), anemia at booking (aOR = 4.27, 95% CI: 2.79-6.54), severe pre-eclampsia or HELLP syndrome (aOR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.74-5.27), uterine fibromas (aOR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.69-4.35), multiple pregnancy (aOR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.39-3.22) and assisted reproductive technologies (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.33-2.65). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, women with a history of severe PPH are at highest risk of severe PPH. As well as other established clinical risk factors for PPH, a history of severe PPH should be included as a risk factor in the development and validation of prediction models for PPH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-016-1217-0

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Metadata

Authors
Nyfløt, L. T., Sandven, I., Stray-Pedersen, B., Pettersen, S., Al-Zirqi, I., Rosenberg, M., Jacobsen, A. F., & Vangen, S.
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2017-01-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
17-17
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570128349
Cited by
312
References
39
FWCI
22.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12884-016-1217-0
The paper
Nyfløt, L. T., Sandven, I., Stray-Pedersen, B., Pettersen, S., Al-Zirqi, I., Rosenberg, M., Jacobsen, A. F., & Vangen, S. (2017). Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1217-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.