Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomised clinical trials of fish oil supplementation in high risk pregnancies

Open access
Olsen, Sjúrour F., Secher, Niels J., Tabor, Ann, Weber, Tom, Walker, James J., Gluud, Christian·2000·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To test the postulated preventive effects of dietary n‐3 fatty acids on pre‐term delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, and pregnancy induced hypertension. Design In six multicentre trials, women with high risk pregnancies were randomly assigned to receive fish oil (Pikasol) or olive oil in identically‐looking capsules from around 20 weeks (prophylactic trials) or 33 weeks (therapeutic trials) until delivery. Setting Nineteen hospitals in Europe. Samples Four prophylactic trials enrolled 232, 280, and 386 women who had experienced previous pre‐term delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, or pregnancy induced hypertension respectively, and 579 with twin pregnancies. Two therapeutic trials enrolled 79 women with threatening pre‐eclampsia and 63 with suspected intrauterine growth retardation. Interventions The fish oil provided 2.7 g and 6.1 g n‐3 fatty acids/day in the prophylactic and therapeutic trials, respectively. Main outcome measures Preterm delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, pregnancy induced hypertension. Results Fish oil reduced recurrence risk of pre‐term delivery from 33% to 21% (odds ratio 0.54 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.98)) but did not affect recurrence risks for the other outcomes (OR 1.26; 0.74 to 2.12 and 0.98; 0.63 to 1.53, respectively). In twin pregnancies, the risks for all three outcomes were similar in the two intervention arms (95% CI for the three odds ratios were 0.73 to 1.40, 0.90 to 1.52, and 0.83 to 2.32, respectively). The therapeutic trials detected no significant effects on pre‐defined outcomes. In the combined trials, fish oil delayed spontaneous delivery (proportional hazards ratio 1.22; 1.07 to 1.39, P= 0.002). Conclusions Fish oil supplementation reduced the recurrence risk of pre‐term delivery, but had no effect on pre‐term delivery in twin pregnancies. Fish oil had no effect on intrauterine growth retardation and pregnancy induced hypertension, affecting neither recurrence risk nor risk in twin pregnancies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13235.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Olsen, S. F., Secher, N. J., Tabor, A., Weber, T., Walker, J. J., & Gluud, C.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
382-395
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1998936516
Cited by
360
References
1
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised clinical trials of fish oil supplementation in high risk pregnancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13235.x
The paper
Olsen, S. F., Secher, N. J., Tabor, A., Weber, T., Walker, J. J., & Gluud, C. (2000). Randomised clinical trials of fish oil supplementation in high risk pregnancies. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13235.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.