Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Female genital appearance: ‘normality’ unfolds

Lloyd, Jillian, Crouch, Naomi S., Minto, Catherine L., Liao, Lih‐Mei, Creighton, Sarah M.·2005·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To describe variations in genital dimensions of normal women. Design Observational cross‐sectional study. Setting Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital, University College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK. Population Fifty premenopausal women having gynaecological procedures not involving the external genitalia under general anaesthetic. Methods A cross sectional study using digital photography and measurements of the external genitalia. Main outcome measures Clitoral size, labial length and width, colour and rugosity, vaginal length, distance from clitoris to urethral orifice, distance from posterior fourchette to anterior anal margin. Results A wide range of values were noted for each measurement. There was no statistically significant association with age, parity, ethnicity, hormonal use or history of sexual activity. Conclusion Women vary widely in genital dimensions. This information should be made available to women when considering surgical procedures on the genitals, decisions for which must be carefully considered between surgeon and woman.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00517.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Lloyd, J., Crouch, N. S., Minto, C. L., Liao, L., & Creighton, S. M.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-12
Volume
112
Issue
5
Pages
643-646
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2105551447
Cited by
431
References
19
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Female genital appearance: ‘normality’ unfolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00517.x
The paper
Lloyd, J., Crouch, N. S., Minto, C. L., Liao, L., & Creighton, S. M. (2005). Female genital appearance: ‘normality’ unfolds. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00517.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.