The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether the introduction of Obstetrics Emergency Training in line with the recommendations of the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) was associated with a reduction in perinatal asphyxia and neonatal hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Design A retrospective cohort observational study. Setting A tertiary referral maternity unit in a teaching hospital. Population Term, cephalic presenting, singleton infants born at Southmead Hospital between 1998 and 2003 were identified; those born by elective Caesarean sections were excluded. Method Five‐minute Apgar scores were reviewed. Infants that developed HIE were prospectively identified throughout this period. The study compared the period ‘pre‐training’ (1998–1999), with the period ‘post‐training’ (2001–2003). Main outcome measures Five‐minute Apgar scores and HIE. Results Infants (19,460) were included. Infants born with 5‐minute Apgar scores of ≤6 decreased from 86.6 to 44.6 per 10,000 births (P < 0.001) and those with HIE decreased from 27.3 to 13.6 per 10,000 births (P= 0.032) following the introduction of the training courses in 2000. Antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth at term rates remained unchanged, at about 15 and 4 per 10,000 births, respectively. Conclusion The introduction of obstetric emergencies training courses was associated with a significant reduction in low 5‐minute Apgar scores and HIE. This improvement has been sustained as the training has continued. This is the first time an educational intervention has been shown to be associated with a clinically important, and sustained, improvement in perinatal outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
(2011) · Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_3055 · Cited by 4,151
Volpe, J. J. (1981) · PubMed · Cited by 2,932
Neonatal Encephalopathy Following Fetal Distress: A Clinical and Electroencephalographic Study
Sarnat, H. B. (1976) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1976.00500100030012 · Cited by 2,680
A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant.
Apgar, V. (1953) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/00000539-195301000-00041 · Cited by 2,015
Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hewson, S. A., Hodnett, E. D., Saigal, S., & Willan, A. R. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3 · Cited by 1,556
A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant.
APGAR, V. (1953) · PubMed · Cited by 787
MacLennan, A. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7216.1054 · Cited by 731
Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1991-1993
Stationery Office (1996) · HMSO eBooks · Cited by 477
Assessment of Neonatal Encephalopathy by Amplitude-integrated Electroencephalography
al Naqeeb, N., Edwards, A. D., Cowan, F. M., & Azzopardi, D. (1999) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.103.6.1263 · Cited by 458
Toet, M. C., Hellström-Westas, L., Groenendaal, F., Eken, P., & de Vries, L. S. (1999) · Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/fn.81.1.f19 · Cited by 442
Cited by
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2011) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e318217e119 · Cited by 1,866
Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM Simulation Design
Watts, P. I., McDermott, D. S., Alinier, G., Charnetski, M., Ludlow, J., Horsley, E., Meakim, C., & Nawathe, P. A. (2021) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.009 · Cited by 731
Lee, A. C., Kozuki, N., Blencowe, H., Vos, T., Bahalim, A., Darmstadt, G. L., Niermeyer, S., Ellis, M., Robertson, N. J., Cousens, S., et al. (2013) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/pr.2013.206 · Cited by 665
Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes
McGaghie, W. C., Draycott, T. J., Dunn, W. F., Lopez, C. M., & Stefanidis, D. (2011) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e318222fde9 · Cited by 336
Self-citationDarmstadt, G. L., Lee, A. C., Cousens, S., Sibley, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Donnay, F., Osrin, D., Bang, A., Kumar, V., Wall, S. N., et al. (2009) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.010 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Draycott, T., Sibanda, T., Owen, L., Akande, V., Winter, C., Reading, S., & Whitelaw, A.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-13
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-182
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1991654947
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00800.x
- The paper
- Draycott, T., Sibanda, T., Owen, L., Akande, V., Winter, C., Reading, S., & Whitelaw, A. (2006). Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00800.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.