Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Weighing up and Balancing out’: A Meta-Synthesis of Barriers to Antenatal Care for Marginalised Women in High-Income Countries

Downe, S, Finlayson, K, Walsh, D, Lavender, T·2009·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Background In high‐resource settings around 20% of maternal deaths are attributed to women who fail to receive adequate antenatal care. Epidemiological evidence suggests many of these women belong to marginalised groups often living in areas of relative deprivation. Reasons for inadequate antenatal attendance have yet to be fully evaluated. Objectives To identify the factors affecting access to antenatal care for marginalised pregnant women living in developed countries. Search strategy We included qualitative studies from developed countries published in English language journals (1980–2007). Selection criteria Qualitative studies exploring the views of marginalised women living in developed countries who either failed to attend for any antenatal care or did so late or irregularly. Data collection and analysis Eight studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were synthesised in accord with the techniques derived from meta‐ethnography. Main results Initial access is influenced by late pregnancy recognition and subsequent denial or acceptance. Continuing access appears to depend on a strategy of weighing up and balancing out of the perceived gains and losses. Personal resources in terms of time, money and social support are considered alongside service provision issues including the perceived quality of care, the trustworthiness and cultural sensitivity of staff and feelings of mutual respect. Conclusions A nonthreatening, nonjudgemental antenatal service run by culturally sensitive staff may increase access to antenatal care for marginalised women. Multiagency initiatives aimed at raising awareness of, and providing access to, antenatal care may also increase uptake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02067.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.0150s1001.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lindmark G, 1988, Antenatal care in developed countries, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 4
  3. World Health Organisation, 2005, The World Health Report (2005) – Make Every Mother and Child Count
  4. World Health Organisation, 1994, Mother‐Baby Package: Implementing Safe Motherhood in Developing Countries (WHO/FHE/MSM/94.11.)
  5. World Health Organisation/United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, 1996, Revised 1990 Estimates of Maternal Mortality: A New Approach by WHO and UNICEF
  6. 10.1002/14651858.CD000934 · DOI
  7. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal And Child Health (CEMACH), 2007, Saving Mothers Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Mothers Safer – 2003–2005, The Seventh Report of the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health in the United Kingdom
  8. 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00315-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00269.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1992.tb02839.x · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00247.pp.x · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0095399702250128 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1996.tb00768.x · DOI
  14. 10.1071/PY04049 · DOI
  15. Buck GM, 1992, Comparison of Native American births in upstate New York with other race births, 1980–86, Public Health Rep, 107, 569
  16. Townsend P, 1992, Inequalities in Health: The Black Report and The Health Divide
  17. 10.1093/pubmed/fdg025 · DOI
  18. Medical Research Council (MRC), 2000, A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCT’s for Complex Interventions to Improve Health
  19. Arney WR, 1982, Power and the Profession of Obstetrics
  20. Donaldson LJ, 2000, Essential Public Health
  21. 10.1016/j.midw.2005.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lincoln YS, 1985, Naturalistic Enquiry
  23. 10.4135/9781412985000 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1258/135581902320432732 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67030-4 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04079.x · DOI
  28. 10.1177/104973239600600407 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/105477389500400105 · DOI
  30. Young CL, 1990, Psychosocial concerns of women who delay prenatal care, Fam Soc, 71, 408, 10.1177/104438949007100703 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90351-R · DOI
  32. Parsons W, 1982, Why Don’t Women Attend for Antenatal Care?, Midwives Chron, 95, 362
  33. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02665.x · DOI
  34. 10.5993/AJHB.30.2.8 · DOI
  35. 10.1023/A:1011301232549 · DOI
  36. 10.1089/108729100416623 · DOI
  37. Dartnall L, 2005, Access to Maternity Services Research Report
  38. 10.1177/0884217505274580 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00389.x · DOI
  40. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2003, Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman – Clinical Guidelines, 6 October 2003
  41. Bluestein D, 1993, Psychosocial determinants of late prenatal care: the health belief model, Fam Med, 25, 269
  42. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00363-5 · DOI
  43. 10.1258/0049475054036814 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00175-S · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00138-6 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0091-2182(97)00155-9 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211028 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0091-2182(96)00030-4 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90002-X · DOI
  50. Carolan M, 2007, Pregnancy care for African refugee women in Australia: attendance at antenatal appointments, Evid Based Midwifery, 5, 54
  51. 10.1097/00012272-200604000-00014 · DOI

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Downe, S., Finlayson, K., Walsh, D., & Lavender, T.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-18
Volume
116
Issue
4
Pages
518-529
ISSN
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
Cited by
166
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Weighing up and Balancing out’: A Meta-Synthesis of Barriers to Antenatal Care for Marginalised Women in High-Income Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02067.x
The paper
Downe, S., Finlayson, K., Walsh, D., & Lavender, T. (2009). ‘Weighing up and Balancing out’: A Meta-Synthesis of Barriers to Antenatal Care for Marginalised Women in High-Income Countries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02067.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.