Cited by 239Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and fetal healthcareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda

Open access
van den Broek, NR, Graham, WJ·2009·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

The quality of care received by mothers and babies in developing countries is often reported as poor. Yet efforts to address this contributory factor to maternal and newborn mortality have received less attention compared with barriers of access to care. The current heightened concern to achieve Millennium Development Goals 4 & 5 has illuminated the neglected quality agenda. Whilst there is no universally‐accepted definition of “quality care”, it is widely acknowledged to embrace multiple levels – from patient to health system, and multiple dimensions, including safety as well as efficiency. Quality care should thus lie at the core of all strategies for accelerating progress towards MDG4 &5. Interventions to measure and improve quality need themselves to be evidence‐based. Two promising approaches are maternal and perinatal death reviews and criterion‐based audit. These and other quality improvement tools have a crucial role to play in the implementation of effective maternal and newborn care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02333.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. WHO, 1999, Reducing Maternal Mortality. A Joint Statement by WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank
  2. WHO, 2004, Making Pregnancy Safer: The Critical Role of the Skilled Attendant
  3. WHO Reproductive Health Indicators, 2006, Guidelines for their Generation, Interpretation and Analysis for Global Monitoring
  4. HawkinsK NewmanK ThomasD CarlsonC.Developing a human rights based approach to addressing maternal mortality – desk review. London: DfID Health Resource Centre 2005.
  5. PowellAE RushmerRK DaviesHTO.A systematic narrative review of quality improvement models in health care. Social Dimensions of Health Institute at the Universities of Dundee and St Andrews Scotland:NHS Quality Improvement Scotland 2009.
  6. Ministry of Health, Malaysia, 1998, Evaluation of Implementation of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the Improvement of Maternal Health Services
  7. 10.1007/S10995-008-0408-03 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van den Broek, N., & Graham, W.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-04
Volume
116
Issue
s1
Pages
18-21
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1607324854
Cited by
239
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
quality of care, maternal health, newborn health, maternal mortality, perinatal mortality, Millennium Development Goals, patient safety, quality improvement, developing countries
MeSH terms
Child Health Services, Developing Countries, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Health Services, Maternal Mortality, Pregnancy, Quality of Health Care, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review