The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antenatal interventions for overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review of randomised trials
Abstract
Please cite this paper as: Dodd J, Grivell R, Crowther C, Robinson J. Antenatal interventions for overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review of randomised trials. BJOG 2010;117:1316–1326. Background Overweight and obesity during pregnancy is an increasing health problem. Objective A systematic review to assess the benefits and harms of antenatal dietary or lifestyle interventions for pregnant women who are overweight or obese. Search strategy The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) was searched (last search January 2010). Reference lists of retrieved studies were searched by hand. No date or language restrictions were used. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials comparing antenatal dietary and/or lifestyle or other interventions with no treatment for overweight or obese women were considered. Studies were evaluated independently for appropriateness for inclusion and methodological quality. The primary outcome was large‐for‐gestational‐age infants. Data collection and analysis Nine randomised controlled trials were included involving 743 women who were overweight or obese during pregnancy. Seven trials compared a dietary intervention with standard antenatal care. Main results There were no statistically significant differences identified between women who received an antenatal intervention and those who did not for the large‐for‐gestational‐age infant outcome (three studies; 366 women; risk ratio 2.02; 95% CI 0.84, 4.86) or mean gestational weight gain [four studies; 416 women; weighted mean difference −3.10 kg; 95% CI −8.32, 2.13 (random‐effects model)]. There were no statistically significant differences identified for other reported outcomes. Author’s conclusions The effect of providing an antenatal dietary intervention for overweight or obese pregnant women on maternal and infant health outcomes remains unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Obesity : Preventing and managing the global epidemic
Akram, D. S., Astrup, A. V., Atinmo, T., Boissin, J.-L., Bray, G. A., Carroll, K. N., Chitson, P., Chen, C., Dietz, W. H., Hill, J. O., et al. (2000) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 12,945
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines
Rasmussen, K. M., & Yaktine, A. L. (2009) · Cited by 4,056
Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease
Ezzati, M., Lopez, A. D., Rodgers, A., Vander Hoorn, S., & Murray, C. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11403-6 · Cited by 3,594
Maternal Morbid Obesity and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
Cedergren, M. I. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000107291.46159.00 · Cited by 1,248
Prepregnancy Weight and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
Cnattingius, S., Bergström, R., Lipworth, L., & Kramer, M. S. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801153380302 · Cited by 1,047
The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population
Callaway, L. K., Chang, A. M., McIntyre, H. D., & Prins, J. B. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00115.x · Cited by 634
Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index
Usha Kiran, T. S., Hemmadi, S., Bethel, J., & Evans, J. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00546.x · Cited by 472
Randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women
Polley, B., Wing, R., & Sims, C. (2002) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802130 · Cited by 465
Etiology and prevention of stillbirth
Fretts, R. C. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.074 · Cited by 462
Cited by
Catalano, P. M., & Shankar, K. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j1 · Cited by 1,306
Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries
Flenady, V., Middleton, P., Smith, G. C., Duke, W., Erwich, J. J., Khong, T. Y., Neilson, J., Ezzati, M., Koopmans, L., Ellwood, D., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60064-0 · Cited by 490
Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial
Dodd, J. M., Turnbull, D., McPhee, A. J., Deussen, A. R., Grivell, R. M., Yelland, L. N., Crowther, C. A., Wittert, G., Owens, J. A., Robinson, J. S., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1285 · Cited by 482
Self-citationKominiarek, M. A., & Peaceman, A. M. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.040 · Cited by 421
Nutrition recommendations in pregnancy and lactation
Kominiarek, M. A., & Rajan, P. (2016) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2016.06.004 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodd, J., Grivell, R., Crowther, C., & Robinson, J.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-07
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1316-1326
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1580644318
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antenatal interventions for overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review of randomised trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02540.x
- The paper
- Dodd, J., Grivell, R., Crowther, C., & Robinson, J. (2010). Antenatal interventions for overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review of randomised trials. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02540.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.