Cited by 145Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Risk factors for small‐for‐gestational‐age infants by customised birthweight centiles: data from an international prospective cohort study

Open access
McCowan, LME, Roberts, CT, Dekker, GA, Taylor, RS, Chan, EHY, Kenny, LC, Baker, PN, Moss‐Morris, R +3 more·2010·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: McCowan L, Roberts C, Dekker G, Taylor R, Chan E, Kenny L, Baker P, Moss‐Morris R, Chappell L, North R on behalf of the SCOPE consortium. Risk factors for small‐for‐gestational‐age infants by customised birthweight centiles: data from an international prospective cohort study. BJOG 2010;117:1599–1607. Objective To identify clinical and ultrasound variables associated with the birth of small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) infants by customised centiles, subclassified according to whether their mothers were normotensive or developed hypertensive complications. Design Prospective, multicentre cohort study. Setting Participating centres of the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) study in Auckland, New Zealand, Adelaide, Australia, Manchester and London, UK, and Cork, Ireland. Population The 3513 nulliparous participants of the SCOPE study. Methods Women were interviewed at 15 ± 1 weeks, and had ultrasound growth measurements and umbilical and uterine Doppler studies at 20 ± 1 weeks. Variables associated with SGA infants were identifed using logistic regression. Main outcome measures Small for gestational age (i.e. a birthweight of less than the tenth customised centile), normotensive‐SGA and hypertensive‐SGA. Comparison groups for statistical analyses were non‐SGA, normotensive non‐SGA and hypertensive non‐SGA. Results Among 376 (10.7%) SGA infants, 281 (74.7%) were normotensive‐SGA and 95 (25.3%) were hypertensive‐SGA. Independent risk factors for normotensive‐SGA were low maternal birthweight, low fruit intake pre‐pregnancy, cigarette smoking, increasing maternal age, daily vigorous exercise, being a tertiary student, head and abdominal circumference of less than the tenth centile and increasing uterine artery Doppler indices at the 20‐week scan. Protective factors were: high green leafy vegetable intake pre‐pregnancy, and rhesus‐negative blood group. Risk factors for hypertensive‐SGA were conception by in vitro fertilisation, previous early pregnancy loss and femur length of less than tenth centile at the 20‐week scan. Conclusions Risk factors for infants who are SGA by customised centiles have been identified in a cohort of healthy nulliparous women. A number of these factors are modifiable; however, further studies are needed to replicate these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02737.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCowan, L., Roberts, C., Dekker, G., Taylor, R., Chan, E., Kenny, L., Baker, P., Moss‐Morris, R., Chappell, L., North, R., & on behalf of the SCOPE consortium
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-15
Volume
117
Issue
13
Pages
1599-1607
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2154694631
Cited by
145
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Board
  • Government of South Australia
  • Auckland District Health Board
  • Australian Government
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Tommy's Baby Charity
  • Tommy's
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
small for gestational age, risk factors, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, uterine artery Doppler, maternal smoking, maternal age, in vitro fertilization, early pregnancy loss, femur length, nulliparous women
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Diagnosis, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Early Diagnosis, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review