Cited by 208Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsGynecological conditions and treatments

Complications after surgery for deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: Complications after surgery for deep endometriosis

Open access
Kondo, W, Bourdel, N, Tamburro, S, Cavoli, D, Jardon, K, Rabischong, B, Botchorishvili, R, Pouly, JL +2 more·2011·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the complications after surgery for deep endometriosis. DESIGN: retrospective study. SETTING: data from the CHU Estaing database and patients' charts between January 1987 and December 2007. SAMPLE: all women given surgical treatment for deep endometriosis. METHODS: women who underwent surgery for deep endometriosis were reviewed for intra- and postoperative complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: primary outcomes were rates of intra- and postoperative complications. Complications were compared according to the procedure performed. RESULTS: a total of 568 women were included in the study, with a mean age of 32.4 years. The mean estimated diameter of the nodule felt by vaginal examination was 1.8 cm (ranging from 0.5 to 7 cm). Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 560 women (98.6%), and conversion was required in 2.3%. The mean operative time was 155 minutes. Intraoperative complications occurred in 12 women (2.1%), including six minor (1.05%) and six major (1.05%) complications. Postoperative complications developed in 79 women (13.9%), including 54 minor (9.5%) and 26 major (4.6%) complications (one woman had both minor and major postoperative complications). The overall major postoperative complication rate for women who underwent any type of rectal surgery (shaving, excision and suture, or segmental resection) was 9.3% (21 out of 226), compared with only 1.5% for the other women (five out of 342) (P < .01). Shaving presented less major postoperative complications compared with segmental resection (24 versus 6.7%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: surgery for deep endometriosis is feasible, but it is associated with major complications, especially when any type of rectal surgery must be performed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02774.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]5. Camagna O, Dhainaut C, Dupuis O, Soncini E, Martin B, Palazzo L, et al. Surgical management of rectovaginal septum endometriosis from a continuous series of 50 cases. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2004;32:199-209.
  2. [10]10. Benbara A, Fortin A, Martin B, Palazzo L, Le Tohic A, Madelenat P, et al. Surgical and functional results of rectosigmoidal resection for severe endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2008;36:1191- 201.
  3. [15]15. Daraı ¨E, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Coutant C, Ballester M. Colorec- tal endometriosis and fertility. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2008;36: 1214-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kondo, W., Bourdel, N., Tamburro, S., Cavoli, D., Jardon, K., Rabischong, B., Botchorishvili, R., Pouly, J., Mage, G., & Canis, M.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
Corresponding author
Kondo, W
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-18
Volume
118
Issue
3
Pages
292-298
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
OpenAlex
W1840818487
Cited by
208
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
postoperative complications, intraoperative complications, laparoscopic surgery, rectal endometriosis, segmentectomy, shaving, conversion to open surgery, surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Pelvis, Postoperative Complications, Rectal Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Uterine Diseases, Vaginal Diseases, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review