Cited by 132Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyMaternal and fetal healthcare

Head-to-body delivery interval and risk of fetal acidosis and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in shoulder dystocia: a retrospective review: Head-to-body delivery interval in shoulder dystocia

Leung, TY, Stuart, O, Sahota, DS, Suen, SSH, Lau, TK, Lao, TT·2011·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between head-to-body delivery interval (HBDI) and cord arterial pH and base excess (BE), and the risk of development of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: A university hospital. POPULATION: Pregnancies complicated with shoulder dystocia during the period 1995-2009. METHODS: Cases were identified from a search of the hospital electronic delivery records. Cord arterial pH and BE, and the incidence of HIE and perinatal death, were retrieved from medical records and correlated with HBDI, birth weight, mode of delivery and presence of nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern and maternal diabetes using univariate analysis, followed by multivariate analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Any association between cord pH and HBDI. RESULTS: Of the 200 cases identified, the mean (standard deviation) HBDI was 2.5 minutes (1.5 minutes). Both HBDI and the presence of nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern were independent factors for pH, and HBDI was the only significant factor for BE. Arterial pH dropped at a rate of 0.011 per minute [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.017-0.004; P = 0.002] with HBDI. The mode of delivery, birth weight and maternal diabetes did not affect blood gas levels. The respective risks of severe acidosis (pH < 7) and HIE with HBDI of <5 minutes were 0.5% and 0.5% versus 5.9% and 23.5% with HBDI ≥ 5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Cord arterial pH drops with HBDI during shoulder dystocia, but the risk of acidosis or HIE is very low with HBDI < 5 minutes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02834.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leung, T., Stuart, O., Sahota, D., Suen, S., Lau, T., & Lao, T.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Leung, TY
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-24
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
474-479
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
OpenAlex
W1503182874
Cited by
132
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
shoulder dystocia, fetal acidosis, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, base excess, perinatal death, non-reassuring fetal heart rate, maternal diabetes, birth weight
MeSH terms
Acidosis, Adult, Dystocia, Female, Fetal Blood, Fetal Diseases, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review