The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education1
Abstract
Web 2.0 sociable technologies and social software are presented as enablers in health and health care, for organizations, clinicians, patients and laypersons. They include social networking services, collaborative filtering, social bookmarking, folksonomies, social search engines, file sharing and tagging, mashups, instant messaging, and online multi‐player games. The more popular Web 2.0 applications in education, namely wikis, blogs and podcasts, are but the tip of the social software iceberg. Web 2.0 technologies represent a quite revolutionary way of managing and repurposing/remixing online information and knowledge repositories, including clinical and research information, in comparison with the traditional Web 1.0 model. The paper also offers a glimpse of future software, touching on Web 3.0 (the Semantic Web) and how it could be combined with Web 2.0 to produce the ultimate architecture of participation. Although the tools presented in this review look very promising and potentially fit for purpose in many health care applications and scenarios, careful thinking, testing and evaluation research are still needed in order to establish ‘best practice models’ for leveraging these emerging technologies to boost our teaching and learning productivity, foster stronger ‘communities of practice’, and support continuing medical education/professional development (CME/CPD) and patient education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems
Wenger, E. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072002 · Cited by 4,274
Beldarrain, Y. (2006) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587910600789498 · Cited by 866
Kim, K., Ryu, E., Chon, M.-Y., Yeun, E.-J., Choi, S.-Y., Seo, J.-S., & Nam, B.-W. (2006) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.02.005 · Cited by 790
Internet use by the socially fearful: addiction or therapy?
Campbell, A. J., Cumming, S. R., & Hughes, I. (2006) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.69 · Cited by 249
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Sharp D., 2006, Smart Internet 2010—Social Networks
- 10.1017/CBO9780511581670 · DOI · Paper page
- Abram S., 2005, Web 2.0—huh? Library 2.0, librarian 2.0, Information Outlook, 9, 44
- Wheeler S., 2006, Learner support needs in online problem‐based learning, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 175
- 10.1080/0268051042000224752 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1999.153097.x · DOI
- 10.5596/c06-001 · DOI
- 10.5596/c06-024 · DOI
- Fahy P. J., 2003, Indicators of support in online interaction, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4
- Shea P. J., 2003, A follow‐up investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY learning network, Journal of Asynchronous Networks, 7, 61
- Levy Y., 2007, Comparing dropout and persistence in e‐learning courses, Computers and Learning, 48, 185
- 10.5596/c06-013 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41 · DOI · Paper page
- Skiba D. J., 2006, Web 2.0: next great thing or just marketing hype?, Nursing Education Perspectives, 27, 212
- 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.07.002 · DOI
- Von Appen K., 2006, Museums and the Web, 2006: Proceedings.
- Savel R. H. Goldstein E. B. Perencevich E. N.&Angood P. B.The iCritical care podcast: a novel medium for critical care communication and education.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2006. Published online ahead of print. · DOI
- 10.1045/april2005-lund · DOI
- Alexander B., Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning?, Educause Review, 41, 33
- 10.1186/1476-072X-4-22 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1089/tmj.2005.11.583 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e17 · DOI
- 10.1177/1359105306061189 · DOI
- 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.451 · DOI
- 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.110 · DOI · Paper page
- Winston B., 1998, Media, Technology Society: a History—from the Printing Press to the Superhighway
- Rheingold H., 2002, Smart Mobs: the Next Social Revolution
- Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind Society: the Development of Higher Mental Processes
- Conrad R. M., 2004, Engaging the Online Learner Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction
- Bender T., 2003, Discussion‐Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning
- 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e24 · DOI
- Surowiecki J., 2004, The Wisdom of Crowds
- 10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.07.003 · DOI
- Bandelli A.A closer look at two citizen‐science web sites.Proceedings of The 2005 Web Designs for Interactive Learning Conference.Available from:http://www.wdil.org/pdf/crt12z.pdf(accessed 29 December 2006).
Cited by
Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022) · Sustainable Operations and Computers · doi:10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 · Cited by 2,647
Moorhead, S. A., Hazlett, D. E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J. K., Irwin, A., & Hoving, C. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1933 · Cited by 2,517
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033 · Cited by 2,109
Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students
Chretien, K. C. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1387 · Cited by 448
Bidmon, S., & Terlutter, R. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4127 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamel Boulos, M. N., & Wheeler, S.
- Venue
- Health Information & Libraries Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02-28
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-23
- ISSN
- 1471-1834 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-1842
- OpenAlex
- W2104959792
- Cited by
- 893
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 196.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
