Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 893

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education1

Kamel Boulos, Maged N., Wheeler, Steve·2007·Health Information & Libraries Journal
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Web 2.0 sociable technologies and social software are presented as enablers in health and health care, for organizations, clinicians, patients and laypersons. They include social networking services, collaborative filtering, social bookmarking, folksonomies, social search engines, file sharing and tagging, mashups, instant messaging, and online multi‐player games. The more popular Web 2.0 applications in education, namely wikis, blogs and podcasts, are but the tip of the social software iceberg. Web 2.0 technologies represent a quite revolutionary way of managing and repurposing/remixing online information and knowledge repositories, including clinical and research information, in comparison with the traditional Web 1.0 model. The paper also offers a glimpse of future software, touching on Web 3.0 (the Semantic Web) and how it could be combined with Web 2.0 to produce the ultimate architecture of participation. Although the tools presented in this review look very promising and potentially fit for purpose in many health care applications and scenarios, careful thinking, testing and evaluation research are still needed in order to establish ‘best practice models’ for leveraging these emerging technologies to boost our teaching and learning productivity, foster stronger ‘communities of practice’, and support continuing medical education/professional development (CME/CPD) and patient education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Sharp D., 2006, Smart Internet 2010—Social Networks
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511581670 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Abram S., 2005, Web 2.0—huh? Library 2.0, librarian 2.0, Information Outlook, 9, 44
  4. Wheeler S., 2006, Learner support needs in online problem‐based learning, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 175
  5. 10.1080/0268051042000224752 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1999.153097.x · DOI
  7. 10.5596/c06-001 · DOI
  8. 10.5596/c06-024 · DOI
  9. Fahy P. J., 2003, Indicators of support in online interaction, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4
  10. Shea P. J., 2003, A follow‐up investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY learning network, Journal of Asynchronous Networks, 7, 61
  11. Levy Y., 2007, Comparing dropout and persistence in e‐learning courses, Computers and Learning, 48, 185
  12. 10.5596/c06-013 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Skiba D. J., 2006, Web 2.0: next great thing or just marketing hype?, Nursing Education Perspectives, 27, 212
  15. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.07.002 · DOI
  16. Von Appen K., 2006, Museums and the Web, 2006: Proceedings.
  17. Savel R. H. Goldstein E. B. Perencevich E. N.&Angood P. B.The iCritical care podcast: a novel medium for critical care communication and education.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2006. Published online ahead of print. · DOI
  18. 10.1045/april2005-lund · DOI
  19. Alexander B., Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning?, Educause Review, 41, 33
  20. 10.1186/1476-072X-4-22 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.07.001 · DOI
  22. 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1089/tmj.2005.11.583 · DOI
  24. 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e17 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/1359105306061189 · DOI
  26. 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.451 · DOI
  27. 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.110 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Winston B., 1998, Media, Technology Society: a History—from the Printing Press to the Superhighway
  29. Rheingold H., 2002, Smart Mobs: the Next Social Revolution
  30. Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind Society: the Development of Higher Mental Processes
  31. Conrad R. M., 2004, Engaging the Online Learner Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction
  32. Bender T., 2003, Discussion‐Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning
  33. 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e24 · DOI
  34. Surowiecki J., 2004, The Wisdom of Crowds
  35. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.07.003 · DOI
  36. Bandelli A.A closer look at two citizen‐science web sites.Proceedings of The 2005 Web Designs for Interactive Learning Conference.Available from:http://www.wdil.org/pdf/crt12z.pdf(accessed 29 December 2006).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kamel Boulos, M. N., & Wheeler, S.
Venue
Health Information & Libraries Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-28
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
2-23
ISSN
  • 1471-1834 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1842
DOI
10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x
OpenAlex
W2104959792
Cited by
893
References
4
FWCI
196.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.