Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

QUAKING MOUSE: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MYELIN PROTEIN

Greenfield, S., Norton, W. T., Morell, P.·1971·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

A new technique, involving final purification on a continuous CsCl gradient, was utilized for the isolation of cerebral myelin from adult (4‐ to 6‐month‐old) quaking mice, littermate controls and young (10‐day‐old) normal mice. The yield of myelin from either adult quaking or normal young mice was 5‐10 per cent of that from adult controls. After deli‐pidation, myelin proteins were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in buffers containing sodium dodecylsulphate. Two gel systems were utilized: (1) a high‐resolution discontinuous electrophoresis system; and (2) a continuous system utilizing gels cross linked with ethylenediacrylate (EDA). The gels from the discontinuous system were stained with Fast Green and quantified by densitometry. The base lability of the EDA‐linked gels permitted direct chemical determination of protein in specific bands. Myelin from brains of normal adult mice contained, as major components, one proteo‐lipid and two basic proteins. There were also a number of high‐molecular‐weight proteins which represented a significant portion of the total. Myelin from quaking mice had qualitatively a similar distribution of proteins but the high‐molecular‐weight fraction comprised a much greater percentage of the total protein. The ratio of basic to proteolipid protein in preparations from quaking mice was considerably higher than that in the myelin from control mice. The distribution pattern of the myelin proteins from 10‐day‐old mice was quantitatively similar to that of quaking mice. Altogether the evidence supports the hypothesis that the quaking mutant provides a model of an immature nervous system with respect to myelination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb05070.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Greenfield, S., Norton, W. T., & Morell, P.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1971-11
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
2119-2128
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2157347912
Cited by
305
References
18
FWCI
35.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QUAKING MOUSE: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MYELIN PROTEIN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb05070.x
The paper
Greenfield, S., Norton, W. T., & Morell, P. (1971). QUAKING MOUSE: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MYELIN PROTEIN. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb05070.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.