Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmacological Differentiation and Characterization of 5‐HT1A, 5‐HT1B, and 5‐HT1CBinding Sites in Rat Frontal Cortex

Peroutka, Stephen J.·1986·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract:Drug interactions with 5‐HT 1(5‐hydroxytryptamine type 1) binding site subtypes were analyzed in rat frontal cortex. 8‐Hydroxy‐N, N‐dipropyl‐2‐aminotetralin (8‐OH‐DPAT) displays high affinity (Ki 3.3 ± 1 n M) for 29 ± 3% of total [3 H]5‐HT binding in rat frontal cortex and low affinity (K, 9,300 ± 1,000) for 71 ± 4% of the remaining 5‐HT 1 sites. Therefore, non‐5‐HT 1A binding in rat frontal cortex was defined as specific [3 H]5‐HT binding observed in the presence of 100 n M 8‐OH‐DPAT. 5‐Methoxy 3‐(1,2,3,6‐tetrahydro‐4‐pyridinyl) 1 H indole (RU 24969), 1–(m‐trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP), mianserin, and methysergide produce shallow competition curves of [3 H]5‐HT binding from non‐5‐HT 1A sites. Addition of 10−‐3M GTP does not increase the apparent Hill slopes of these competition curves. Computer‐assisted iterative curve fitting suggests that these drugs can discriminate two distinct subpopulations of non‐5‐HT 1A binding sites, each representing ∼35% of the total [3 H]5‐HT binding in the rat frontal cortex. All three 5‐HT, binding site subtypes display nanomolar affinity for 5‐HT and 5‐methoxytryptamine. A homogeneous population of 5‐HT 1A sites can be directly labeled using [3 H]8‐OH‐DPAT. These sites display nanomolar affinity for 8‐OH‐DPAT, WB 4101, RU 24969, 2‐{4‐(4‐(2‐pyrimidinyl)‐1‐piperazinyl]butyl}‐1,2‐benzisothiazol‐3‐(2 H)one‐1,1‐dioxidehydrochloride (TVX Q 7821), 5‐methoxydimethyltryptamine, and N‐lysergic acid diethylamide. The potencies of RU 24969, TFMPP, and quipazine for [3 H]5‐HT binding are increased by addition of 100 n M 8‐OH‐DPAT and 3,000 n M mianserin to the [3 H]5‐HT binding assay. Moreover, the drugs have apparent Hill slopes near 1 under these conditions. This subpopulation of total [3 H]5‐HT binding is designated 5‐HT 1B. By contrast, methysergide and mianserin become more potent inhibitors of residual [3 H]5‐HT binding to non‐5‐HT 1A sites in the presence of 100 n M 8‐OH‐DPAT and 10 n M RU 24969. The drug competition curves under these conditions have apparent Hill slopes of near unity and these sites are designated 5‐HT 1C. Drug competition studies using a series of 24 agents reveals that each 5‐HT, subtype site has a unique pharmacological profile. These results suggest that radioligand studies can be used to differentiate three distinct subpopulations of 5‐HT, binding sites labeled by [3 H]5‐HT in rat frontal cortex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb04532.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Peroutka, S. J.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-08
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
529-540
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2043750066
Cited by
344
References
33
FWCI
14.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacological Differentiation and Characterization of 5‐HT1A, 5‐HT1B, and 5‐HT1CBinding Sites in Rat Frontal Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb04532.x
The paper
Peroutka, S. J. (1986). Pharmacological Differentiation and Characterization of 5‐HT1A, 5‐HT1B, and 5‐HT1CBinding Sites in Rat Frontal Cortex. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb04532.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.