The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Ischemia on the In Vivo Release of Striatal Dopamine, Glutamate, and γ‐Aminobutyric Acid Studied by Intracerebral Microdialysis
Abstract
Abstract: We have previously described a marked attenuation of postischemic striatal neuronal death by prior substantia nigra (SN) lesioning. The present study was carried out to evaluate whether the protective effect of the lesion involves changes in the degree of local cerebral blood flow (1CBF) reduction, energy metabolite depletion, or alterations in the extracellular release of striatal dopamine (DA), glutamate (Glu), or γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA). Control and SN‐lesioned rats were subjected to 20 min of forebrain ischemia by four‐vessel occlusion combined with systemic hypotension. Levels of 1CBF, as measured by the autoradiographic method, and energy metabolites were uniformly reduced in both the ipsi‐ and contralateral striata at the end of the ischemic period, a finding implying that the lesion did not affect the severity of the ischemic insult itself. Extracellular neurotransmitter levels were measured by microdialysis; the perfusate was collected before, during, and after ischemia. An ∼ 500‐fold increase in DA content, a 7‐fold increase in Giu content, and a 5‐fold increase in GABA content were observed during ischemia in nonlesioned animals. These levels gradually returned to baseline by 30 min of reperfusion. In SN‐lesioned rats, the release of DA was completely prevented, the release of GABA was not affected, and the release of Glu was partially attenuated. However, excessive extracellular Glu concentrations were still attained, which are potentially toxic. This, taken together with the previous neuropathological findings, suggests that excessive release of DA is important for the development of ischemic cell damage in the striatum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Excitotoxicity and stroke: Identifying novel targets for neuroprotection
Lai, T. W., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. T. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.006 · Cited by 1,106
Neuropathogenesis of Delirium: Review of Current Etiologic Theories and Common Pathways
Maldonado, J. R. (2013) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2013.09.005 · Cited by 745
Rodent models of cerebral ischemia.
Ginsberg, M. D., & Busto, R. (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.12.1627 · Cited by 659
Self-citationDelirium pathophysiology: An updated hypothesis of the etiology of acute brain failure
Maldonado, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4823 · Cited by 617
Moghaddam, B. (1993) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb13387.x · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Globus, M. Y. ‐., Busto, R., Dietrich, W. D., Martinez, E., Valdes, I., & Ginsberg, M. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1455-1464
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2060049453
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Ischemia on the In Vivo Release of Striatal Dopamine, Glutamate, and γ‐Aminobutyric Acid Studied by Intracerebral Microdialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb01111.x
- The paper
- Globus, M. Y. ‐., Busto, R., Dietrich, W. D., Martinez, E., Valdes, I., & Ginsberg, M. D. (1988). Effect of Ischemia on the In Vivo Release of Striatal Dopamine, Glutamate, and γ‐Aminobutyric Acid Studied by Intracerebral Microdialysis. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb01111.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.