Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative Effect of Transient Global Ischemia on Extracellular Levels of Glutamate, Glycine, and γ‐Aminobutyric Acid in Vulnerable and Nonvulnerable Brain Regions in the Rat

Globus, Mordecai Y.‐T., Busto, Raul, Martinez, Elena, Valdés, Isabel, Dietrich, W. Dalton, Ginsberg, Myron D.·1991·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

We evaluated whether regional differences in the magnitude of glutamate, γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glycine release could explain why some regions are vulnerable to ischemia whereas others are spared. By means of the microdialysis technique, the temporal profile of ischemia‐induced changes in extracellular levels of glutamate, GABA, and glycine was compared in regions that demonstrate differing susceptibilities to a 10‐ and 20‐min ischemic insult (dorsal hippocampus, anterior thalamus, somatosensory cortex, and dorsolateral striatum). The degree of ischemia (as established by local cerebral blood flow reduction) and the magnitude of histopathoiogical neuronal damage were also evaluated in these regions. The blood flow reduction was severe and uniform in all regions; however, the histopathoiogical outcome illustrated a different pattern. Whereas the CA1 sector of the hippocampus was severely damaged, the thalamus and cortex were relatively spared from both 10 and 20 min of ischemia. Striatal neurons were resistant to a 10‐min insult but severely damaged after 20 min of ischemia. Ischemia‐induced increases in glutamate and GABA content were of a similar magnitude and temporal profile in all four brain regions. A uniform increase in extracellular glycine levels was also observed in all four brain structures. The postischemic response, however, was different Glycine levels remained twofold higher than baseline in the hippocampus but fell to baseline in the cortex and thalamus after both 10‐ and 20‐min insults. In the striatum, glycine levels returned to baseline after 10 min of ischemia but remained relatively high after a 20‐min insult Although ischemic neuronal damage was not related to glutamate release, it correlated with the „excitotoxic index,” whose value was derived from the following equation: [glutamate] X [glycine]/[GABA]. No significant changes were observed in the excitotoxic index during ischemia. However, a significant increase in the index was observed in vulnerable brain regions during the early and late recirculation periods. These results suggest that the imbalance between excitation and inhibition, reflected by changes in the excitotoxic index, may account for regional vulnerability to ischemia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb03775.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Globus, M. Y. ‐., Busto, R., Martinez, E., Valdés, I., Dietrich, W. D., & Ginsberg, M. D.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-08
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
470-478
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2031773044
Cited by
299
References
0
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Effect of Transient Global Ischemia on Extracellular Levels of Glutamate, Glycine, and γ‐Aminobutyric Acid in Vulnerable and Nonvulnerable Brain Regions in the Rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb03775.x
The paper
Globus, M. Y. ‐., Busto, R., Martinez, E., Valdés, I., Dietrich, W. D., & Ginsberg, M. D. (1991). Comparative Effect of Transient Global Ischemia on Extracellular Levels of Glutamate, Glycine, and γ‐Aminobutyric Acid in Vulnerable and Nonvulnerable Brain Regions in the Rat. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb03775.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.