The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extracellular Concentration and In Vivo Recovery of Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens Using Microdialysis
Abstract
Abstract: The present study compared two different in vivo microdialysis methods which estimate the extracellular concentration of analytes at a steady state where there is no effect of probe sampling efficiency. Each method was used to estimate the basal extracellular concentration of dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens of the rat. In the first method, DA is added to the perfusate at concentrations above and below the expected extracellular concentration (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 n M) and DA is measured in the dialysate from the brain to generate a series of points which are interpolated to determine the concentration of no net flux. Using this method, basal DA was estimated to be 4.2 ± 0.2 n M (mean ± SEM, n = 5). The slope of the regression gives the in vivo recovery of DA, which was 65 ± 5%. This method was also used to estimate a basal extracellular 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) concentration in the nucleus accumberis of 5.7 ± 0.6 μ M, with an in vivo recovery of 52 ± 11% (n = 5). A further experiment which extended the perfusate concentration range showed that the in vivo recovery of DA is significantly higher than the in vivo recovery of DOPAC (p < 0.001), whereas the in vitro recoveries of DA and DOPAC are not significantly different from each other. The in vivo difference is thought to be caused by active processes associated with the DA nerve terminal, principally release and uptake of DA, which may alter the concentration gradient in the tissue surrounding the probe. The second method measures dialysate DA at several perfusion flow rates (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 1.2 μ1/min) and extrapolates the data to zero flow using a nonlinear least squares regression. This method estimated a basal extracellular DA concentration of 3.9 ± 0.2 n M (n = 5). The two independent methods are in reasonable agreement that the extracellular concentration of DA in the nucleus accumbens is about 4 n M.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dopamine motive system: implications for drug and food addiction
Volkow, N. D., Wise, R. A., & Baler, R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.130 · Cited by 939
Bilder, R. M., Volavka, J., Lachman, H. M., & Grace, A. A. (2004) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300542 · Cited by 769
Endogenous nicotinic cholinergic activity regulates dopamine release in the striatum
Zhou, F.-M., Liang, Y., & Dani, J. A. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn769 · Cited by 585
Real-time measurement of dopamine fluctuations after cocaine in the brain of behaving rats
Heien, M. L. A. V., Khan, A. S., Ariansen, J. L., Cheer, J. F., Phillips, P. E. M., Wassum, K. M., & Wightman, R. M. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504657102 · Cited by 482
Weiss, F., Parsons, L. H., Schulteis, G., Hyytiä, P., Lorang, M. T., Bloom, F. E., & Koob, G. F. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-10-03474.1996 · Cited by 457
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsons, L. H., & Justice, J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 212-218
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2055584145
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracellular Concentration and In Vivo Recovery of Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens Using Microdialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09298.x
- The paper
- Parsons, L. H., & Justice, J. B. (1992). Extracellular Concentration and In Vivo Recovery of Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens Using Microdialysis. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09298.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.