Cited by 132Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and EffectsStress Responses and Cortisol

Stimulation of Brain Pregnenolone Synthesis by Mitochondrial Diazepam Binding Inhibitor Receptor Ligands In Vivo

Korneyev, A., Pan, B. S., Polo, A., Romeo, E., Guidotti, A., Costa, E.·1993·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Evidence that neurosteroids are potent modulators of the action of GABA at GABAA receptors has prompted the investigation of the mechanism that controls brain neurosteroid synthesis by glial cell mitochondria in vivo. In vitro studies suggest that the interaction of the diazepam binding inhibitor (DBI)--a polypeptide that is abundant in steroidogenic cells--with glial mitochondrial DBI receptors (MDRs) is a crucial step in the physiological regulation of neurosteroid biosynthesis. MDRs bind 4'-chlorodiazepam (4'-CD), N,N-di-n-hexyl-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-indol-3-acetamide (FGIN-1-27), and the isoquinoline carboxamide PK 11195 with high affinity, and these ligands have been used to investigate whether the stimulation of glial MDRs increases brain pregnenolone production in vivo. Adrenalectomized and castrated (A-C) male rats (to eliminate peripheral sources of pregnenolone) were pretreated with trilostane (to prevent pregnenolone metabolism to progesterone), and the pregnenolone content in brain regions dissected after fixation with a 0.8-s exposure to microwave irradiation focused to the head was determined by HPLC followed by specific radioimmunoassay. The forebrain and cerebellum of A-C rats contained 4-7 ng of pregnenolone/g of tissue, and the olfactory bulb contained 10-14 ng/g. These concentrations of brain pregnenolone are only 30-40% lower than those of sham-operated rats. In contrast, the plasma pregnenolone content of sham-operated rats was 2-3 ng/ml, but it was only 0.1…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb13647.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korneyev, A., Pan, B. S., Polo, A., Romeo, E., Guidotti, A., & Costa, E.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Costa, E.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-10
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
1515-1524
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1992144144
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1 RO1 MH49486-01, R01MH049486)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
pregnenolone synthesis, neurosteroidogenesis, 4'-chlorodiazepam, PK11195, adrenalectomy, castration, trilostane, GABA receptors, olfactory bulb
MeSH terms
Adrenalectomy, Animals, Brain, Carrier Proteins, Ligands, Male, Mitochondria, Orchiectomy, Pregnenolone, Receptors, Cell Surface, Steroids, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Diazepam Binding Inhibitor, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review