The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The novel neuromodulator hydrogen sulfide: an endogenous peroxynitrite ‘scavenger’?
Open accessAbstract
Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) is a well‐known cytotoxic gas. Recently it has been shown to stimulate N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors to enhance long‐term potentiation suggesting a novel neuromodulatory role in vivo. Endogenous levels of H 2 S in the brain are reported to range between 10 and 160 µ m. Considerably lower H 2 S levels are reported in the brains of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, where levels of brain protein nitration (probably mediated by peroxynitrite) are markedly increased. Activation of NMDA receptors leads to intracellular tyrosine nitration by peroxynitrite. Because H 2 S and peroxynitrite are important mediators in brain function and disease, we investigated the effects of the H 2 S ‘donor’, sodium hydrogen sulfide (NaSH) on peroxynitrite‐mediated damage to biomolecules and to cultured human SH‐SY5Y cells. H 2 S significantly inhibited peroxynitrite‐mediated tyrosine nitration and inactivation of α 1‐antiproteinase to a similar extent to reduced glutathione at each concentration tested (30–250 µ m). H 2 S also inhibited peroxynitrite‐induced cytotoxicity, intracellular protein nitration and protein oxidation in human neuroblastoma SH‐SY5Y cells. These data suggest that H 2 S has the potential to act as an inhibitor of peroxynitrite‐mediated processes in vivo and that the potential antioxidant action of H 2 S deserves further study, given that extracellular GSH levels in the brain are very low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beal, M. F. (2002) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00780-3 · Cited by 763
Danysz, W., & Parsons, C. G. (2003) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.938 · Cited by 404
Cited by
Chemical Biology of H2S Signaling through Persulfidation
Filipovic, M. R., Zivanovic, J., Alvarez, B., & Banerjee, R. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00205 · Cited by 1,046
Szabo, C., & Papapetropoulos, A. (2017) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.117.014050 · Cited by 423
Fukuto, J. M., Carrington, S. J., Tantillo, D. J., Harrison, J. G., Ignarro, L. J., Freeman, B. A., Chen, A., & Wink, D. A. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx2005234 · Cited by 389
Whiteman, M., Li, L., Kostetski, I., Chu, S. H., Siau, J. L., Bhatia, M., & Moore, P. K. (2006) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.02.154 · Cited by 377
Self-citationChemical foundations of hydrogen sulfide biology
Li, Q., & Lancaster, J. R. (2013) · Nitric Oxide · doi:10.1016/j.niox.2013.07.001 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Whiteman, M., Armstrong, J. S., Chu, S. H., Jia‐Ling, S., Wong, B., Cheung, N. S., Halliwell, B., & Moore, P. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-02
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 765-768
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2016901103
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The novel neuromodulator hydrogen sulfide: an endogenous peroxynitrite ‘scavenger’? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02617.x
- The paper
- Whiteman, M., Armstrong, J. S., Chu, S. H., Jia‐Ling, S., Wong, B., Cheung, N. S., Halliwell, B., & Moore, P. K. (2004). The novel neuromodulator hydrogen sulfide: an endogenous peroxynitrite ‘scavenger’? Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02617.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.