Cited by 79Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Fasudil protects hippocampal neurons against hypoxia-reoxygenation injury by suppressing microglial inflammatory responses in mice

Ding, Jing, Li, Qin‐Ying, Wang, Xin, Sun, Chang‐Hai, Lu, Chuan‐Zhen, Xiao, Bao‐Guo·2010·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

J. Neurochem. (2010) 114, 1619–1629. Rho kinase (ROCK) may play an important role in regulating biological events of cells, including proliferation, differentiation and survival/death. Blockade of ROCK promotes axonal regeneration and neuron survival in vivo and in vitro, thereby exhibiting potential clinical applications in spinal cord damage and stroke. Our previous studies have demonstrated that Fasudil, a selective ROCK inhibitor, induced neuroprotection in vitro. Here we used an in vivo model of hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) injury to examine the neuroprotective effect of Fasudil, and explore its possible mechanism(s) in vivo. H/R resulted in the loss of hippocampal neurons, accompanied by increased apoptosis of neurons in hippocampus. The expression of ROCK II and activity of ROCK in the brain were increased after H/R, and located only in microglia, but not in astrocytes and neurons. The administration of Fasudil inhibited the activity of ROCK in brain tissue and cultured microglia, and protected hippocampal neurons against H/R injury. Further immunohistochemical analysis and cytokine determination revealed that Fasudil inhibited inducible nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity in microglia and pro‐inflammatory factors in brain tissue after H/R, which is consistent with the observation wherein Fasudil reduced the pro‐inflammatory factors nitric oxide, IL‐1β, IL‐6 and TNF‐α, and increased anti‐inflammatory factor IL‐10 in cultured microglia under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Our results indicate that inhibition of ROCK by Fasudil may represent a useful therapeutic perspective by inhibiting microglial inflammatory responses in the CNS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06876.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ROCK inhibition shifts microglia from their proinflammatory M1 phenotype toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype by inhibiting NF-κB activity and expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα, while increasing expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.

    “Interestingly, ROCK inhibition has been reported to shift microglia from their proinflammatory M1 phenotype toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype by inhibiting NF-кB activity and expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα, while increasing the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [155,156,157].”

    From RhoA Signaling in Neurodegenerative Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [156]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Simi A., Tsakiri N., Wang P. and Rothwell N. J. (2007) Interleukin-1 and inflammatory neurodegeneration. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35, 1122–1126.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, J., Li, Q., Wang, X., Sun, C., Lu, C., & Xiao, B.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xiao, Bao‐Guo
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09
Volume
114
Issue
6
Pages
1619-1629
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1521888719
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
fasudil, Rho kinase inhibition, hypoxia/reoxygenation injury, hippocampal neurons, neuroprotection, microglial inflammation, neuronal apoptosis, inducible nitric oxide synthase, inflammatory cytokines, IL-10, ischemic brain injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Astrocytes, Cells, Cultured, Hypoxia, Brain, Embryo, Mammalian, Hippocampus, Inflammation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Oxygen, Cell Hypoxia, Cytokines, Apoptosis, Microglia, Neuroprotective Agents, 1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-Methylpiperazine, Mice, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II, rho-Associated Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review