The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Masculine Bias in the Attribution of Personhood: People = Male, Male = People
Abstract
Silveira (1980) noted that not just masculine generics, but also neutral terms, have masculine connotations; she called this the “people = male” bias. Her hypothesis takes two forms: people = male, a male is more likely seen as a person than is a female; and male = people, a person is more likely believed to be male than female. A total of 108 female and 91 male college students participated in three studies. Study 1 tested male = people. Participants referring back to a female or male protagonist as a woman/man or as a person were significantly more likely to refer to the male with a nongender-specific term. Studies 2 and 3 tested people = male. In Study 2, reanalysis of data from Hamilton and Henley (1982) showed that hearing unbiased generics promoted male-biased mental imagery in men. In Study 3, participants' imagined “typical person” was significantly more likely to be male than female.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hamilton (1991) found that after listening to stories with masculine pronouns, participants reported more mental images of male than female story characters.
“She (Hamilton, 1991) found that after listening to stories in which either masculine pronouns, neutral pronouns, or masculine and feminine pronouns were used to describe a group of people, participants who'd heard the masculine pronouns reported more mental images of male than female story characters.”
From Definitions of Gender and Sex: The Subtleties of Meaning (2000) · cites this paper as Hamilton, 1991
Citations
Cites
Does Sex‐biased Job Advertising “Aid and Abet” Sex Discrimination? 1
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x · Cited by 218
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1037/h0028797 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00287623 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00288993 · DOI · Paper page
- Hamilton M. C. (1989, March). Does male-biased language in a state constitution really hurt? Paper presented at a conference of the Association for Women in Psychology, Newport, RI
- Hamilton M. C., Henley N. M. (1982, August). Sex bias in language: Effects on the reader/hearer's cognitions. Paper presented at a conference of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles
- Hamilton M. C., New directions in feminist psychology
- Harrison L., 1975, Science and Children,, 12, 22
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-3588-0_4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90369-4 · DOI
- Martyna W., 1978, Dissertation Abstracts International,, 39, 3050B
- 10.1086/493733 · DOI
- Matlin M. W., 1987, The psychology of women
- Penfield J., 1987, Women and language in transition
- 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92113-2 · DOI
- Wilcoxon F., 1964, Some rapid approximate statistical procedures
- Women on Words and Images., 1972, Dick and Jane as victims: Sex stereotyping in children's readers
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Definitions of Gender and Sex: The Subtleties of Meaning
Pryzgoda, J., & Chrisler, J. C. (2000) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/a:1007123617636 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Centre College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hamilton, Mykol C.
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-402
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2015936725
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- masculine bias, gender stereotypes, generic masculine, neutral terms, gendered language, mental imagery, gender stereotypes in language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review