Cited by 120Gender Studies in LanguageSocial and Intergroup PsychologyGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Masculine Bias in the Attribution of Personhood: People = Male, Male = People

Hamilton, Mykol C.·1991·Psychology of Women Quarterly

Abstract

Silveira (1980) noted that not just masculine generics, but also neutral terms, have masculine connotations; she called this the “people = male” bias. Her hypothesis takes two forms: people = male, a male is more likely seen as a person than is a female; and male = people, a person is more likely believed to be male than female. A total of 108 female and 91 male college students participated in three studies. Study 1 tested male = people. Participants referring back to a female or male protagonist as a woman/man or as a person were significantly more likely to refer to the male with a nongender-specific term. Studies 2 and 3 tested people = male. In Study 2, reanalysis of data from Hamilton and Henley (1982) showed that hearing unbiased generics promoted male-biased mental imagery in men. In Study 3, participants' imagined “typical person” was significantly more likely to be male than female.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00415.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hamilton (1991) found that after listening to stories with masculine pronouns, participants reported more mental images of male than female story characters.

    “She (Hamilton, 1991) found that after listening to stories in which either masculine pronouns, neutral pronouns, or masculine and feminine pronouns were used to describe a group of people, participants who'd heard the masculine pronouns reported more mental images of male than female story characters.”

    From Definitions of Gender and Sex: The Subtleties of Meaning (2000) · cites this paper as Hamilton, 1991

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1037/h0028797 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF00287623 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00288993 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hamilton M. C. (1989, March). Does male-biased language in a state constitution really hurt? Paper presented at a conference of the Association for Women in Psychology, Newport, RI
  5. Hamilton M. C., Henley N. M. (1982, August). Sex bias in language: Effects on the reader/hearer's cognitions. Paper presented at a conference of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles
  6. Hamilton M. C., New directions in feminist psychology
  7. Harrison L., 1975, Science and Children,, 12, 22
  8. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3588-0_4 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90369-4 · DOI
  10. Martyna W., 1978, Dissertation Abstracts International,, 39, 3050B
  11. 10.1086/493733 · DOI
  12. Matlin M. W., 1987, The psychology of women
  13. Penfield J., 1987, Women and language in transition
  14. 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92113-2 · DOI
  16. Wilcoxon F., 1964, Some rapid approximate statistical procedures
  17. Women on Words and Images., 1972, Dick and Jane as victims: Sex stereotyping in children's readers

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hamilton, M. C.
Affiliations
Centre College (US)
Corresponding author
Hamilton, Mykol C.
Venue
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
1991-11
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
393-402
ISSN
  • 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6402
OpenAlex
W2015936725
Cited by
120
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
masculine bias, gender stereotypes, generic masculine, neutral terms, gendered language, mental imagery, gender stereotypes in language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review